Deceptive Explanations by Large Language Models Lead People to Change their Beliefs About Misinformation More Often than Honest Explanations
Valdemar Danry, Pat Pataranutaporn, Matthew Groh, Ziv Epstein
Abstract
Advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, specifically large language models (LLMs), have the capability to generate not just misinformation, but also deceptive explanations that can justify and propagate false information and discredit true information. We examined the impact of deceptive AI generated explanations on individuals’ beliefs in a pre-registered online experiment with 11,780 observations from 589 participants. We found that in addition to being more persuasive than accurate and honest explanations, AI-generated deceptive explanations can significantly amplify belief in false news headlines and undermine true ones as compared to AI systems that simply classify the headline incorrectly as being true/false. Moreover, our results show that logically invalid explanations are deemed less credible - diminishing the effects of deception. This underscores the importance of teaching logical reasoning and critical thinking skills to identify logically invalid arguments, fostering greater resilience against advanced AI-driven misinformation.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get f656ea97-38d5-44f0-a955-f9e376eec35dCited by top-tier papers10
- Invisible Saboteurs: Sycophantic LLMs Mislead Novices in Problem-Solving TasksJessica Y. Bo, Majeed Kazemitabaar, Mengqing Deng, Michael Inzlicht et al.CHI 2026 · 8 citations
- Tell Me What I Missed: Interacting with GPT during Recalling of One-Time Witnessed EventsSuifang Zhou, Qi Gong, Ximing Shen, Ray LCCHI 2026 · 5 citations
- PRISON: Unmasking the Criminal Potential of Large Language ModelsXinyi Wu, Geng Hong, Pei Chen, Yueyue Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Dialogues with AI Reduce Beliefs in Misinformation but Build No Lasting Discernment SkillsAnku Rani, Valdemar Danry, Paul Pu Liang, Andrew Lippman et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Are We Automating the Joy Out of Work? Designing AI to Augment Work, Not MeaningJaspreet Ranjit, Ke Zhou, Swabha Swayamdipta, Daniele QuerciaCHI 2026 · 2 citations
Related papers
- "Can LLMs Persuade Humans with Deception?": From a Deceptive Strategy Taxonomy to a Large-Scale Empirical StudyHaein Yeo, Seungwan Jin, Taehyung Noh, Yejin Shin et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Large Language Model (LLM)-driven Adversarial Social Influences in Online Information Spread: Risks and InterventionsZhuoran Lu, Gionnieve Lim, Ming YinCHI 2026
- Tackling the Root of Misinformation by Teaching Laypeople about Logical Fallacies via Socratic Questioning and Critical ArgumentationMinjing Shi, Junling Wang, Jingwei Ni, Sankalan Pal Chowdhury et al.ACL 2026
- Beyond Accuracy: Experts See AI Fact-Checks as Accurate but Less UsefulChenyan Jia, Apoorva Gondimalla, Angie Zhang, David Joseph Mullings et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?Canyu Chen, Kai ShuICLR 2024 · 270 citations
