Lune

CHI2026Top-tier venue

Dialogues with AI Reduce Beliefs in Misinformation but Build No Lasting Discernment Skills

Anku Rani, Valdemar Danry, Paul Pu Liang, Andrew Lippman, Pattie Maes

2026Year
3Citations

Abstract

Given the growing prevalence of fake information, including increasingly realistic AI-generated news, there is an urgent need to train people to better evaluate and detect misinformation. While interactions with AI have been shown to durably reduce people’s beliefs in false information, it is unclear whether these interactions also teach people the skills to discern false information themselves. We conducted a month-long study where 67 participants classified news headline-image pairs as real or fake, discussed their assessments with an AI system, followed by an unassisted evaluation of unseen news items to measure accuracy before, during, and after AI assistance. While AI assistance produced immediate improvements during AI-assisted sessions (+21% average), participants’ unassisted performance on new items declined significantly by 15.3% in week 4 compared to week 0. These results indicate that while AI may help immediately, it may ultimately degrade long-term misinformation detection abilities.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext e6c7fc06-053f-441a-b6c9-879c70dbd859

Builds on12

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines