VAGUE: Visual Contexts Clarify Ambiguous Expressions
Heejeong Nam, Jinwoo Ahn, Keummin Ka, Jiwan Chung, Youngjae Yu
Abstract
Human communication often relies on visual cues to resolve ambiguity. While humans can intuitively integrate these cues, AI systems often find it challenging to engage in sophisticated multimodal reasoning. We introduce VAGUE, a benchmark evaluating multimodal AI systems' ability to integrate visual context for intent disambiguation. VAGUE consists of 1.6 K ambiguous textual expressions, each paired with an image and multiple-choice interpretations, where the correct answer is only apparent with visual context. The dataset spans both staged, complex (Visual Commonsense Reasoning) and natural, personal (Ego4D) scenes, ensuring diversity. Our experiments reveal that existing multimodal AI models struggle to infer the speaker's true intent. While performance consistently improves from the introduction of more visual cues, the overall accuracy remains far below human performance, highlighting a critical gap in multimodal reasoning. Analysis of failure cases demonstrates that current models fail to distinguish true intent from superficial correlations in the visual scene, indicating that they perceive images but do not effectively reason with them. We release our code and data at https://hazel-heejeong-nam.github.io/vague/.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e1e2c6dd-e6b8-4e3b-85d8-d7f8c0e40db1Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on17
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- What matters when building vision-language models?Hugo Laurençon, Léo Tronchon, Matthieu Cord, Victor SanhNeurIPS 2024 · 401 citations
- Socratic Models: Composing Zero-Shot Multimodal Reasoning with LanguageAndy Zeng, Maria Attarian, Brian Ichter, Krzysztof Marcin Choromanski et al.ICLR 2023 · 171 citations
- When did you become so smart, oh wise one?! Sarcasm Explanation in Multi-modal Multi-party DialoguesShivani Kumar, Atharva Kulkarni, Md. Shad Akhtar, Tanmoy ChakrabortyACL 2022 · 54 citations
Related papers
- MUCAR: Benchmarking Multilingual Cross-Modal Ambiguity Resolution for Multimodal Large Language ModelsXiaolong Wang, Zhaolu Kang, Wangyuxuan Zhai, Xinyue Lou et al.EMNLP 2025
- VisuLogic: A Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Reasoning in Multi-modal Large Language ModelsWeiye Xu, Jiahao Wang, Weiyun Wang, Zhe Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 103 citations
- CRIT: Graph-Based Automatic Data Synthesis to Enhance Cross-Modal Multi-Hop ReasoningJunyoung Sung, Seungwoo Lyu, Minjun Kim, Sumin An et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- MMSI-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Image Spatial IntelligenceSihan Yang, Runsen Xu, Yiman Xie, Sizhe Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 195 citations
- Can visual language models resolve textual ambiguity with visual cues? Let visual puns tell you!Jiwan Chung, Seungwon Lim, Jaehyun Jeon, Seungbeen Lee et al.EMNLP 2024 · 8 citations
