Data Feedback Loops: Model-driven Amplification of Dataset Biases
Rohan Taori, Tatsunori Hashimoto
Abstract
Datasets scraped from the internet have been critical to the successes of large-scale machine learning. Yet, this very success puts the utility of future internet-derived datasets at potential risk, as model outputs begin to replace human annotations as a source of supervision. In this work, we first formalize a system where interactions with one model are recorded as history and scraped as training data in the future. We then analyze its stability over time by tracking changes to a test-time bias statistic (e.g. gender bias of model predictions). We find that the degree of bias amplification is closely linked to whether the model's outputs behave like samples from the training distribution, a behavior which we characterize and define as consistent calibration. Experiments in three conditional prediction scenarios - image classification, visual role-labeling, and language generation - demonstrate that models that exhibit a sampling-like behavior are more calibrated and thus more stable. Based on this insight, we propose an intervention to help calibrate and stabilize unstable feedback systems. Code is available at https://github.com/rtaori/data_feedback.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e1a82854-c750-47ee-8cb5-6a89cf7f2f9bCited by top-tier papers23
- Does Writing with Language Models Reduce Content Diversity?Vishakh Padmakumar, He HeICLR 2024 · 173 citations
- A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing AssistantsMina Lee, Katy Ilonka Gero, John Joon Young Chung, Simon Buckingham Shum et al.CHI 2024 · 133 citations
- Feedback Loops With Language Models Drive In-Context Reward HackingAlexander Pan, Erik Jones, Meena Jagadeesan, Jacob SteinhardtICML 2024 · 67 citations
- Pre-training under infinite computeKonwoo Kim, Suhas Kotha, Percy Liang, Tatsunori HashimotoICLR 2026 · 25 citations
- Automating Data Annotation under Strategic Human Agents: Risks and Potential SolutionsTian Xie, Xueru ZhangNeurIPS 2024 · 12 citations
Builds on16
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language UnderstandingChitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,965 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
Related papers
- Recursive Training Loops in LLMs: How training data properties modulate distribution shift in generated data?Grgur Kovac, Jérémy Perez, Rémy Portelas, Peter Ford Dominey et al.EMNLP 2025
- Would Deep Generative Models Amplify Bias in Future Models?Tianwei Chen, Yusuke Hirota, Mayu Otani, Noa Garcia et al.CVPR 2024
- Men Also Do Laundry: Multi-Attribute Bias AmplificationDora Zhao, Jerone Theodore Alexander Andrews, Alice XiangICML 2023 · 29 citations
- Evaluating Short-Term Temporal Fluctuations of Social Biases in Social Media Data and Masked Language ModelsYi Zhou, Danushka Bollegala, José Camacho-ColladosEMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- Upstream Mitigation Is Not All You Need: Testing the Bias Transfer Hypothesis in Pre-Trained Language ModelsRyan Steed, Swetasudha Panda, Ari Kobren, Michael L. WickACL 2022 · 52 citations
