Men Also Do Laundry: Multi-Attribute Bias Amplification
Dora Zhao, Jerone Theodore Alexander Andrews, Alice Xiang
Abstract
As computer vision systems become more widely deployed, there is increasing concern from both the research community and the public that these systems are not only reproducing but amplifying harmful social biases. The phenomenon of bias amplification, which is the focus of this work, refers to models amplifying inherent training set biases at test time. Existing metrics measure bias amplification with respect to single annotated attributes (e.g., ). However, several visual datasets consist of images with multiple attribute annotations. We show models can learn to exploit correlations with respect to multiple attributes (e.g., , ), which are not accounted for by current metrics. In addition, we show current metrics can give the erroneous impression that minimal or no bias amplification has occurred as they involve aggregating over positive and negative values. Further, these metrics lack a clear desired value, making them difficult to interpret. To address these shortcomings, we propose a new metric: Multi-Attribute Bias Amplification. We validate our proposed metric through an analysis of gender bias amplification on the COCO and imSitu datasets. Finally, we benchmark bias mitigation methods using our proposed metric, suggesting possible avenues for future bias mitigation
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9a8b376e-7405-4e6a-88af-edb7838c7b5eCited by top-tier papers12
- FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation BenchmarkLaura Gustafson, Chloé Rolland, Nikhila Ravi, Quentin Duval et al.ICCV 2023 · 74 citations
- Overwriting Pretrained Bias with Finetuning DataAngelina Wang, Olga RussakovskyICCV 2023 · 50 citations
- Images Speak Louder than Words: Understanding and Mitigating Bias in Vision-Language Model from a Causal Mediation PerspectiveZhaotian Weng, Zijun Gao, Jerone Theodore Alexander Andrews, Jieyu ZhaoEMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- When majority rules, minority loses: bias amplification of gradient descentFrançois Bachoc, Jérôme Bolte, Ryan Boustany, Jean-Michel LoubesNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- DPA: A one-stop metric to measure bias amplification in classification datasetsBhanu Tokas, Rahul Nair, Hannah KernerNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on12
- Learning The Difference That Makes A Difference With Counterfactually-Augmented DataDivyansh Kaushik, Eduard H. Hovy, Zachary Chase LiptonICLR 2020 · 625 citations
- Balanced Datasets Are Not Enough: Estimating and Mitigating Gender Bias in Deep Image RepresentationsTianlu Wang, Jieyu Zhao, Mark Yatskar, Kai-Wei Chang et al.ICCV 2019 · 469 citations
- Understanding and Evaluating Racial Biases in Image CaptioningDora Zhao, Angelina Wang, Olga RussakovskyICCV 2021 · 165 citations
- Fair Generative Modeling via Weak SupervisionKristy Choi, Aditya Grover, Trisha Singh, Rui Shu et al.ICML 2020 · 160 citations
- Robustness to Spurious Correlations in Text Classification via Automatically Generated CounterfactualsZhao Wang, Aron CulottaAAAI 2021 · 114 citations
Related papers
- Quantifying Societal Bias Amplification in Image CaptioningYusuke Hirota, Yuta Nakashima, Noa GarciaCVPR 2022 · 45 citations
- Directional Bias AmplificationAngelina Wang, Olga RussakovskyICML 2021 · 1 citation
- Gender Artifacts in Visual DatasetsNicole Meister, Dora Zhao, Angelina Wang, Vikram V. Ramaswamy et al.ICCV 2023 · 37 citations
- Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias MitigationZeyu Wang, Klint Qinami, Ioannis Christos Karakozis, Kyle Genova et al.CVPR 2020
- Intrinsic Bias Metrics Do Not Correlate with Application BiasSeraphina Goldfarb-Tarrant, Rebecca Marchant, Ricardo Muñoz Sánchez, Mugdha Pandya et al.ACL 2021
