Recursive Training Loops in LLMs: How training data properties modulate distribution shift in generated data?
Grgur Kovac, Jérémy Perez, Rémy Portelas, Peter Ford Dominey, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in the creation of online content, creating feedback loops as subsequent generations of models will be trained on this synthetic data. Such loops were shown to lead to distribution shifts -models misrepresenting the true underlying distributions of human data (also called model collapse). However, how human data properties affect such shifts remains poorly understood. In this paper, we provide the first empirical examination of the effect of such properties on the outcome of recursive training. We first confirm that using different human datasets leads to distribution shifts of different magnitudes. Through exhaustive manipulation of dataset properties combined with regression analyses, we then identify a set of properties associated with distribution shift magnitudes. Lexical diversity is found to amplify these shifts, while semantic diversity and data quality mitigate them. Furthermore, we find that these influences are highly modular: data scrapped from a given internet domain has little influence on the content generated for another domain. Finally, experiments on political bias reveal that human data properties affect whether the initial bias will be amplified or reduced. Overall, our results portray a novel view, where different parts of internet may undergo different types of distribution shift.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on9
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADSina Alemohammad, Josue Casco-Rodriguez, Lorenzo Luzi, Ahmed Imtiaz Humayun et al.ICLR 2024 · 279 citations
- A Tale of Tails: Model Collapse as a Change of Scaling LawsElvis Dohmatob, Yunzhen Feng, Pu Yang, François Charton et al.ICML 2024 · 123 citations
- On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own DataQuentin Bertrand, Avishek Joey Bose, Alexandre Duplessis, Marco Jiralerspong et al.ICLR 2024 · 93 citations
- Will Large-scale Generative Models Corrupt Future Datasets?Ryuichiro Hataya, Han Bao, Hiromi AraiICCV 2023 · 76 citations
Related papers
- The Lock-in Hypothesis: Stagnation by AlgorithmTianyi Qiu, Zhonghao He, Tejasveer Chugh, Max Kleiman-WeinerICML 2025
- Are Language Models Any Good at Density Modeling?Sriram Ranga, Sai Shashank Bedampeta, Rui Mao, Anupam ChattopadhyayAAAI 2026
- LLM See, LLM Do: Leveraging Active Inheritance to Target Non-Differentiable ObjectivesLuísa Shimabucoro, Sebastian Ruder, Julia Kreutzer, Marzieh Fadaee et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Demystifying Synthetic Data in LLM Pre-training: A Systematic Study of Scaling Laws, Benefits, and PitfallsFeiyang Kang, Newsha Ardalani, Michael Kuchnik, Youssef Emad et al.EMNLP 2025
- Data Pollination: An Emergent Ecological Process Driving AI Population EvolutionShufang Xie, Qizhi Pei, Ang Lv, Jingyang Hu et al.ACL 2026
