USENIX Security2025Top-tier venue
The Conspiracy Money Machine: Uncovering Telegram's Conspiracy Channels and their Profit Model
Vincenzo Imperati, Massimo La Morgia, Alessandro Mei, Alberto Maria Mongardini, Francesco Sassi
Abstract
In recent years, major social media platforms have implemented increasingly strict moderation policies, resulting in bans and restrictions on conspiracy theory-related content. To circumvent these restrictions, conspiracy theorists are turning to alternatives, such as Telegram, where they can express and spread their views with fewer limitations. Telegram offers channels, virtual rooms where only administrators can broadcast messages, and a more permissive content policy. These features have created the perfect breeding ground for a complex ecosystem of conspiracy channels. In this paper, we illuminate this ecosystem. First, we propose an approach to detect conspiracy channels. Then, we discover that conspiracy channels can be clustered into four distinct communities comprising over 17,000 channels. Finally, we uncover the"Conspiracy Money Machine,"revealing how most conspiracy channels actively seek to profit from their subscribers. We find conspiracy theorists leverage e-commerce platforms to sell questionable products or lucratively promote them through affiliate links. Moreover, we observe that conspiracy channels use donation and crowdfunding platforms to raise funds for their campaigns. We determine that this business involves hundreds of thousands of donors and generates a turnover of almost $71 million.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e17f7170-00a7-4424-a10f-90492b7109dcCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- What Makes People Join Conspiracy Communities?: Role of Social Factors in Conspiracy EngagementShruti Phadke, Mattia Samory, Tanushree MitraCSCW 2020 · 50 citations
- "Is it a Qoincidence?": An Exploratory Study of QAnon on VoatAntonis Papasavva, Jeremy Blackburn, Gianluca Stringhini, Savvas Zannettou et al.WWW 2021 · 46 citations
- Conspiracy Brokers: Understanding the Monetization of YouTube Conspiracy TheoriesCameron Ballard, Ian Goldstein, Pulak Mehta, Genesis Smothers et al.WWW 2022 · 28 citations
- The Pod People: Understanding Manipulation of Social Media Popularity via Reciprocity AbuseJanith Weerasinghe, Bailey Flanigan, Aviel J. Stein, Damon McCoy et al.WWW 2020 · 24 citations
- Characterizing Reddit Participation of Users Who Engage in the QAnon Conspiracy TheoriesKristen Engel, Yiqing Hua, Taixiang Zeng, Mor NaamanCSCW 2022 · 14 citations
Related papers
- Characterizing and Detecting Propaganda-Spreading Accounts on TelegramKlim Kireev, Yevhen Mykhno, Carmela Troncoso, Rebekah OverdorfUSENIX Security 2025
- The Information Ecosystem of Conspiracy Theory: Examining the QAnon Narrative on FacebookSoojong Kim, Jisu KimCSCW 2023 · 6 citations
- Exposing Cross-Platform Coordinated Inauthentic Activity in the Run-Up to the 2024 U.S. ElectionFederico Cinus, Marco Minici, Luca Luceri, Emilio FerraraWWW 2025 · 22 citations
- Characterizing Social Imaginaries and Self-Disclosures of Dissonance in Online Conspiracy Discussion CommunitiesShruti Phadke, Mattia Samory, Tanushree MitraCSCW 2021 · 20 citations
- The Anatomy of a Cryptocurrency Pump-and-Dump SchemeJiahua Xu, Benjamin LivshitsUSENIX Security 2019 · 146 citations
