Characterizing Reddit Participation of Users Who Engage in the QAnon Conspiracy Theories
Kristen Engel, Yiqing Hua, Taixiang Zeng, Mor Naaman
Abstract
Widespread conspiracy theories may significantly impact our society. This paper focuses on the QAnon conspiracy theory, a consequential conspiracy theory that started on and disseminated successfully through social media. Our work characterizes how Reddit users who have participated in QAnon-focused subreddits engage in activities on the platform, especially outside their own communities. Using a large-scale Reddit moderation action against QAnon-related activities in 2018 as the source, we identified 13,000 users active in the early QAnon communities. We collected the 2.1 million submissions and 10.8 million comments posted by these users across all of Reddit from October 2016 to January 2021. The majority of these users were only active after the emergence of the QAnon conspiracy theory and decreased in activity after Reddit's 2018 QAnon ban. A qualitative analysis of a sample of 915 subreddits where the "QAnon-enthusiastic" users were especially active shows that they participated in a diverse range of subreddits, often of unrelated topics to QAnon. However, most of the users' submissions were concentrated in subreddits that have sympathetic attitudes towards the conspiracy theory, characterized by discussions that were pro-Trump, or emphasized unconstricted behavior (often anti-establishment and anti-interventionist). Further study of a sample of 1,571 of these submissions indicates that most consist of links from low-quality sources, bringing potential harm to the broader Reddit community. These results point to the likelihood that the activities of early QAnon users on Reddit were dedicated and committed to the conspiracy, providing implications on both platform moderation design and future research.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 407d188f-2fd1-49ed-9c77-6618920645d1Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deplatforming as a Moderation Strategy on TwitterShagun Jhaver, Christian Boylston, Diyi Yang, Amy S. BruckmanCSCW 2021 · 168 citations
- What Makes People Join Conspiracy Communities?: Role of Social Factors in Conspiracy EngagementShruti Phadke, Mattia Samory, Tanushree MitraCSCW 2020 · 50 citations
- "Is it a Qoincidence?": An Exploratory Study of QAnon on VoatAntonis Papasavva, Jeremy Blackburn, Gianluca Stringhini, Savvas Zannettou et al.WWW 2021 · 46 citations
- Characterizing Social Imaginaries and Self-Disclosures of Dissonance in Online Conspiracy Discussion CommunitiesShruti Phadke, Mattia Samory, Tanushree MitraCSCW 2021 · 20 citations
Related papers
- Do Platform Migrations Compromise Content Moderation? Evidence from r/The_Donald and r/IncelsManoel Horta Ribeiro, Shagun Jhaver, Savvas Zannettou, Jeremy Blackburn et al.CSCW 2021 · 102 citations
- The Information Ecosystem of Conspiracy Theory: Examining the QAnon Narrative on FacebookSoojong Kim, Jisu KimCSCW 2023 · 6 citations
- Make Reddit Great Again: Assessing Community Effects of Moderation Interventions on r/The_DonaldAmaury Trujillo, Stefano CresciCSCW 2022 · 55 citations
- The Private Life of QAnon: A Mixed Methods Investigation of Americans' Exposure to QAnon Content on the WebRyan C. Moore, Ross Dahlke, Peter L. Forberg, Jeffrey T. HancockCSCW 2024 · 2 citations
- Among Us: Language of Conspiracy Theorists on Mainstream RedditFrancesco Corso, Giuseppe Russo, Francesco Pierri, Gianmarco De Francisci MoralesACL 2026 · 2 citations
