What Makes People Join Conspiracy Communities?: Role of Social Factors in Conspiracy Engagement
Shruti Phadke, Mattia Samory, Tanushree Mitra
Abstract
Widespread conspiracy theories, like those motivating anti-vaccination attitudes or climate change denial, propel collective action, and bear society-wide consequences. Yet, empirical research has largely studied conspiracy theory adoption as an individual pursuit, rather than as a socially mediated process. What makes users join communities endorsing and spreading conspiracy theories? We leverage longitudinal data from 56 conspiracy communities on Reddit to compare individual and social factors determining which users join the communities. Using a quasi-experimental approach, we first identify 30K future conspiracists?(FC) and30K matched non-conspiracists?(NC). We then provide empirical evidence of the importance of social factors across six dimensions relative to the individual factors by analyzing 6 million Reddit comments and posts. Specifically, in social factors, we find that dyadic interactions with members of the conspiracy communities and marginalization outside of the conspiracy communities are the most important social precursors to conspiracy joining-even outperforming individual factor baselines. Our results offer quantitative backing to understand social processes and echo chamber effects in conspiratorial engagement, with important implications for democratic institutions and online communities.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 951d9977-22d3-4fe9-8f4a-8b344df9ac1cCited by top-tier papers9
- Making a Radical Misogynist: How Online Social Engagement with the Manosphere Influences Traits of RadicalizationHussam Habib, Padmini Srinivasan, Rishab NithyanandCSCW 2022 · 38 citations
- Characterizing Social Imaginaries and Self-Disclosures of Dissonance in Online Conspiracy Discussion CommunitiesShruti Phadke, Mattia Samory, Tanushree MitraCSCW 2021 · 20 citations
- Predicting Information Pathways Across Online CommunitiesYiqiao Jin, Yeon-Chang Lee, Kartik Sharma, Meng Ye et al.KDD 2023 · 18 citations
- Characterizing Reddit Participation of Users Who Engage in the QAnon Conspiracy TheoriesKristen Engel, Yiqing Hua, Taixiang Zeng, Mor NaamanCSCW 2022 · 14 citations
- Causal Modeling of Climate Activism on RedditJacopo Lenti, Luca Maria Aiello, Corrado Monti, Gianmarco De Francisci MoralesWWW 2025 · 5 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Learning from the Ex-Believers: Individuals' Journeys In and Out of Conspiracy Theories OnlineKristen Engel, Shruti Phadke, Tanushree MitraCSCW 2023 · 10 citations
- "Is it a Qoincidence?": An Exploratory Study of QAnon on VoatAntonis Papasavva, Jeremy Blackburn, Gianluca Stringhini, Savvas Zannettou et al.WWW 2021 · 46 citations
- Exit Stories: Using Reddit Self-Disclosures to Understand Disengagement from Problematic CommunitiesShruti PhadkeCSCW 2025 · 2 citations
- What's the Norm Around Here? Individuals' Responses Can Mitigate the Effects of Misinformation Prevalence in Shaping Perceptions of a CommunityZhila Aghajari, Eric P. S. Baumer, Dominic DiFranzoCHI 2023 · 8 citations
- Among Us: Language of Conspiracy Theorists on Mainstream RedditFrancesco Corso, Giuseppe Russo, Francesco Pierri, Gianmarco De Francisci MoralesACL 2026 · 2 citations
