Lune

CCS2024Top-tier venue

Avara: A Uniform Evaluation System for Perceptibility Analysis Against Adversarial Object Evasion Attacks

Xinyao Ma, Chaoqi Zhang, Huadi Zhu, L. Jean Camp, Ming Li, Xiaojing Liao

Abstract

Thanks to recent advances in machine learning (ML) techniques, Autonomous Driving (AD) has seen significant breakthroughs with enhanced capabilities. However, the susceptibility of ML models to adversarial evasion attacks poses a critical threat, undermining the reliability of autonomous driving systems. Despite efforts by researchers to mitigate these attacks within the AD context, unfortunately, a significant gap persists in fully understanding such adversarial maneuvers, particularly from a driver's perspective. To bridge this gap, we propose Avara, the first unified evaluation platform for assessing human drivers' perceptibility to adversarial attacks in AD contexts. Leveraging Virtual Reality (VR) and eyetracking technology, Avara captures multi-modal driver awareness data, enabling detailed assessments of driver perception. Our approach integrates three distinct sources of multi-modal awareness evaluation metrics, addressing gaps inherent in previous evaluation strategies. The effectiveness and usability of Avara were validated through a human subject study, where participants engaged actively with the platform and provided extensive feedback on their perception and response to adversarial evasion attacks. Utilizing Avara, we identify an intriguing discovery that the current imperceptibility metrics for adversarial attacks fail to accurately reflect the autonomous vehicle driver's perceptibility. CCS Concepts • Security and privacy → Usability in security and privacy; • Human-centered computing → User studies.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on11

  1. Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
  2. Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous DrivingYulong Cao, Chaowei Xiao, Benjamin Cyr, Yimeng Zhou et al.CCS 2019 · 626 citations
  3. Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World AttacksYulong Cao, Ningfei Wang, Chaowei Xiao, Dawei Yang et al.S&P 2021 · 309 citations
  4. Shadows can be Dangerous: Stealthy and Effective Physical-world Adversarial Attack by Natural PhenomenonYiqi Zhong, Xianming Liu, Deming Zhai, Junjun Jiang et al.CVPR 2022 · 148 citations
  5. SLAP: Improving Physical Adversarial Examples with Short-Lived Adversarial PerturbationsGiulio Lovisotto, Henry Turner, Ivo Sluganovic, Martin Strohmeier et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 123 citations

Related papers

  1. Does Physical Adversarial Example Really Matter to Autonomous Driving? Towards System-Level Effect of Adversarial Object Evasion AttackNingfei Wang, Yunpeng Luo, Takami Sato, Kaidi Xu et al.ICCV 2023 · 65 citations
  2. Physically Realizable Adversarial Examples for LiDAR Object DetectionJames Tu, Mengye Ren, Sivabalan Manivasagam, Ming Liang et al.CVPR 2020
  3. Malicious Attacks against Multi-Sensor Fusion in Autonomous DrivingYi Zhu, Chenglin Miao, Hongfei Xue, Yunnan Yu et al.MobiCom 2024 · 28 citations
  4. Can We Use Arbitrary Objects to Attack LiDAR Perception in Autonomous Driving?Yi Zhu, Chenglin Miao, Tianhang Zheng, Foad Hajiaghajani et al.CCS 2021 · 65 citations
  5. Fooling Detection Alone is Not Enough: Adversarial Attack against Multiple Object TrackingYunhan Jia, Yantao Lu, Junjie Shen, Qi Alfred Chen et al.ICLR 2020 · 113 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines