Fooling Detection Alone is Not Enough: Adversarial Attack against Multiple Object Tracking
Yunhan Jia, Yantao Lu, Junjie Shen, Qi Alfred Chen, Hao Chan, Zhenyu Zhong, Tao Wei
Abstract
Recent work in adversarial machine learning started to focus on the visual perception in autonomous driving and studied Adversarial Examples (AEs) for object detection models. However, in such visual perception pipeline the detected objects must also be tracked, in a process called Multiple Object Tracking (MOT), to build the moving trajectories of surrounding obstacles. Since MOT is designed to be robust against errors in object detection, it poses a general challenge to existing attack techniques that blindly target objection detection: we find that a success rate of over 98% is needed for them to actually affect the tracking results, a requirement that no existing attack technique can satisfy. In this paper, we are the first to study adversarial machine learning attacks against the complete visual perception pipeline in autonomous driving, and discover a novel attack technique, tracker hijacking, that can effectively fool MOT using AEs on object detection. Using our technique, successful AEs on as few as one single frame can move an existing object in to or out of the headway of an autonomous vehicle to cause potential safety hazards. We perform evaluation using the Berkeley Deep Drive dataset and find that on average when 3 frames are attacked, our attack can have a nearly 100% success rate while attacks that blindly target object detection only have up to 25%.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3883ba31-a732-4805-889f-83227222c1c2Cited by top-tier papers28
- Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World AttacksYulong Cao, Ningfei Wang, Chaowei Xiao, Dawei Yang et al.S&P 2021 · 309 citations
- Dirty Road Can Attack: Security of Deep Learning based Automated Lane Centering under Physical-World AttackTakami Sato, Junjie Shen, Ningfei Wang, Yunhan Jia et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 152 citations
- Can We Use Arbitrary Objects to Attack LiDAR Perception in Autonomous Driving?Yi Zhu, Chenglin Miao, Tianhang Zheng, Foad Hajiaghajani et al.CCS 2021 · 65 citations
- Does Physical Adversarial Example Really Matter to Autonomous Driving? Towards System-Level Effect of Adversarial Object Evasion AttackNingfei Wang, Yunpeng Luo, Takami Sato, Kaidi Xu et al.ICCV 2023 · 65 citations
- SlowTrack: Increasing the Latency of Camera-Based Perception in Autonomous Driving Using Adversarial ExamplesChen Ma, Ningfei Wang, Qi Alfred Chen, Chao ShenAAAI 2024 · 44 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- ControlLoc: Physical-World Hijacking Attack on Camera-based Perception in Autonomous DrivingChen Ma, Ningfei Wang, Zhengyu Zhao, Qian Wang et al.CCS 2025
- Physical Hijacking Attacks against Object TrackersRaymond Muller, Yanmao Man, Z. Berkay Celik, Ming Li et al.CCS 2022 · 12 citations
- pi-Jack: Physical-World Adversarial Attack on Monocular Depth Estimation with Perspective HijackingTianyue Zheng, Jingzhi Hu, Rui Tan, Yinqian Zhang et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 8 citations
- Get a Model! Model Hijacking Attack Against Machine Learning ModelsAhmed Salem, Michael Backes, Yang ZhangNDSS 2022
- Semi-supervised Semantics-guided Adversarial Training for Robust Trajectory PredictionRuochen Jiao, Xiangguo Liu, Takami Sato, Qi Alfred Chen et al.ICCV 2023 · 26 citations
