Shadows can be Dangerous: Stealthy and Effective Physical-world Adversarial Attack by Natural Phenomenon
Yiqi Zhong, Xianming Liu, Deming Zhai, Junjun Jiang, Xiangyang Ji
Abstract
Estimating the risk level of adversarial examples is essential for safely deploying machine learning models in the real world. One popular approach for physical-world attacks is to adopt the “sticker-pasting” strategy, which however suffers from some limitations, including difficulties in access to the target or printing by valid colors. A new type of non-invasive attacks emerged recently, which attempt to cast perturbation onto the target by optics based tools, such as laser beam and projector. However, the added optical patterns are artificial but not natural. Thus, they are still conspicuous and attention-grabbed, and can be easily noticed by humans. In this paper, we study a new type of optical adversarial examples, in which the perturbations are generated by a very common natural phenomenon, shadow, to achieve naturalistic and stealthy physical-world adversarial attack under the black-box setting. We extensively evaluate the effectiveness of this new attack on both simulated and real-world environments. Experimental results on traffic sign recognition demonstrate that our algorithm can generate adversarial examples effectively, reaching 98.23% and 90.47% success rates on LISA and GTSRB test sets respectively, while continuously misleading a moving camera over 95% of the time in real-world scenarios. We also offer discussions about the limitations and the defense mechanism of this attack <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup> <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup> Our code is available at https://github.com/hncszyq/ShadowAttack.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers25
- RFLA: A Stealthy Reflected Light Adversarial Attack in the Physical WorldDonghua Wang, Wen Yao, Tingsong Jiang, Chao Li et al.ICCV 2023 · 47 citations
- Distracting Downpour: Adversarial Weather Attacks for Motion EstimationJenny Schmalfuss, Lukas Mehl, Andrés BruhnICCV 2023 · 23 citations
- Breaking Barriers in Physical-World Adversarial Examples: Improving Robustness and Transferability via Robust FeatureYichen Wang, Yuxuan Chou, Ziqi Zhou, Hangtao Zhang et al.AAAI 2025 · 20 citations
- F&F Attack: Adversarial Attack against Multiple Object Trackers by Inducing False Negatives and False PositivesTao Zhou, Qi Ye, Wenhan Luo, Kaihao Zhang et al.ICCV 2023 · 13 citations
- When Lighting Deceives: Exposing Vision-Language Models' Illumination Vulnerability Through Illumination Transformation AttackHanqing Liu, Shouwei Ruan, Yao Huang, Shiji Zhao et al.ICCV 2025 · 13 citations
Builds on9
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Accessorize to a Crime: Real and Stealthy Attacks on State-of-the-Art Face RecognitionMahmood Sharif, Sruti Bhagavatula, Lujo Bauer, Michael K. ReiterCCS 2016 · 1,765 citations
- HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based AttackJianbo Chen, Michael I. Jordan, Martin J. WainwrightS&P 2020 · 797 citations
- Learning Black-Box Attackers with Transferable Priors and Query FeedbackJiancheng Yang, Yangzhou Jiang, Xiaoyang Huang, Bingbing Ni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 96 citations
- Adversarial Camouflage: Hiding Physical-World Attacks With Natural StylesRanjie Duan, Xingjun Ma, Yisen Wang, James Bailey et al.CVPR 2020
Related papers
- Targeted Physical Evasion Attacks in the Near-Infrared DomainPascal Zimmer, Simon Lachnit, Alexander Jan Zielinski, Ghassan KarameNDSS 2026
- The Fluorescent Veil: A Stealthy and Effective Physical Adversarial Patch Against Traffic Sign RecognitionShuai Yuan, Xingshuo Han, Hongwei Li, Guowen Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Invisible but Detected: Physical Adversarial Shadow Attack and Defense on LiDAR Object DetectionRyunosuke Kobayashi, Kazuki Nomoto, Yuna Tanaka, Go Tsuruoka et al.USENIX Security 2025
- SLAP: Improving Physical Adversarial Examples with Short-Lived Adversarial PerturbationsGiulio Lovisotto, Henry Turner, Ivo Sluganovic, Martin Strohmeier et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 123 citations
- Invisible Perturbations: Physical Adversarial Examples Exploiting the Rolling Shutter EffectAthena Sayles, Ashish Hooda, Mohit Gupta, Rahul Chatterjee et al.CVPR 2021
