Lune

CVPR2021Top-tier venue

Invisible Perturbations: Physical Adversarial Examples Exploiting the Rolling Shutter Effect

Athena Sayles, Ashish Hooda, Mohit Gupta, Rahul Chatterjee, Earlence Fernandes

2021Year
15Top-tier citations

Abstract

Physical adversarial examples for camera-based computer vision have so far been achieved through visible artifacts -a sticker on a Stop sign, colorful borders around eyeglasses or a 3D printed object with a colorful texture. An implicit assumption here is that the perturbations must be visible so that a camera can sense them. By contrast, we contribute a procedure to generate, for the first time, physical adversarial examples that are invisible to human eyes. Rather than modifying the victim object with visible artifacts, we modify light that illuminates the object. We demonstrate how an attacker can craft a modulated light signal that adversarially illuminates a scene and causes targeted misclassifications on a state-of-the-art ImageNet deep learning model. Concretely, we exploit the radiometric rolling shutter effect in commodity cameras to create precise striping patterns that appear on images. To human eyes, it appears like the object is illuminated, but the camera creates an image with stripes that will cause ML models to output the attacker-desired classification. We conduct a range of simulation and physical experiments with LEDs, demonstrating targeted attack rates up to 84%.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 8bacd9fb-d0cf-4f9e-9f7e-789cb07bc2dc

Cited by top-tier papers15

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on3

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines