Adaptive Testing and Debugging of NLP Models
Marco Túlio Ribeiro, Scott M. Lundberg
Abstract
Current approaches to testing and debugging NLP models rely on highly variable human creativity and extensive labor, or only work for a very restrictive class of bugs. We present AdaTest, a process which uses large scale language models (LMs) in partnership with human feedback to automatically write unit tests highlighting bugs in a target model. Such bugs are then addressed through an iterative text-fixretest loop, inspired by traditional software development. In experiments with expert and non-expert users and commercial / research models for 8 different tasks, AdaTest makes users 5-10x more effective at finding bugs than current approaches, and helps users effectively fix bugs without adding new bugs. * Equal contribution, author order chosen by casting lots.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dff7f2ec-260f-4839-af47-5afcd14a62e4Cited by top-tier papers41
- Task Arithmetic in the Tangent Space: Improved Editing of Pre-Trained ModelsGuillermo Ortiz-Jiménez, Alessandro Favero, Pascal FrossardNeurIPS 2023 · 272 citations
- Patching open-vocabulary models by interpolating weightsGabriel Ilharco, Mitchell Wortsman, Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Shuran Song et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 230 citations
- Safe LoRA: The Silver Lining of Reducing Safety Risks when Finetuning Large Language ModelsChia-Yi Hsu, Yu-Lin Tsai, Chih-Hsun Lin, Pin-Yu Chen et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 165 citations
- DyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning TasksKaijie Zhu, Jiaao Chen, Jindong Wang, Neil Zhenqiang Gong et al.ICLR 2024 · 92 citations
- EvalLM: Interactive Evaluation of Large Language Model Prompts on User-Defined CriteriaTae Soo Kim, Yoonjoo Lee, Jamin Shin, Young-Ho Kim et al.CHI 2024 · 81 citations
Builds on6
- Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-shot Performance of Language ModelsZihao Zhao, Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Dan Klein et al.ICML 2021 · 1,843 citations
- Learning The Difference That Makes A Difference With Counterfactually-Augmented DataDivyansh Kaushik, Eduard H. Hovy, Zachary Chase LiptonICLR 2020 · 625 citations
- Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language UnderstandingYixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal et al.ACL 2020 · 602 citations
- Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP Models with CheckListMarco Túlio Ribeiro, Tongshuang Wu, Carlos Guestrin, Sameer SinghACL 2020 · 51 citations
- Polyjuice: Generating Counterfactuals for Explaining, Evaluating, and Improving ModelsTongshuang Wu, Marco Túlio Ribeiro, Jeffrey Heer, Daniel S. WeldACL 2021
Related papers
- Evaluating and Mitigating the Misguidance Effect of Buggy Code in LLM-Generated Unit TestsJunda Zhao, Shurui Zhou, Eldan CohenISSTA 2026 · 1 citation
- ATGen: Adversarial Reinforcement Learning for Test Case GenerationQingyao Li, Xinyi Dai, Weiwen Liu, Xiangyang Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Fixing Model Bugs with Natural Language PatchesShikhar Murty, Christopher D. Manning, Scott M. Lundberg, Marco Túlio RibeiroEMNLP 2022 · 10 citations
- AssertFlip: Reproducing Bugs via Inversion of LLM-Generated Passing TestsLara Khatib, Noble Saji Mathews, Meiyappan NagappanICSE 2026 · 1 citation
- Measuring the Influence of Incorrect Code on Test GenerationDong Huang, Jie M. Zhang, Mark Harman, Mingzhe Du et al.ICSE 2026
