AI-Augmented Brainwriting: Investigating the use of LLMs in group ideation
Orit Shaer, Angelora Cooper, Osnat Mokryn, Andrew L. Kun, Hagit Ben-Shoshan
Abstract
The growing availability of generative AI technologies such as large language models (LLMs) has significant implications for creative work. This paper explores twofold aspects of integrating LLMs into the creative process – the divergence stage of idea generation, and the convergence stage of evaluation and selection of ideas. We devised a collaborative group-AI Brainwriting ideation framework, which incorporated an LLM as an enhancement into the group ideation process, and evaluated the idea generation process and the resulted solution space. To assess the potential of using LLMs in the idea evaluation process, we design an evaluation engine and compared it to idea ratings assigned by three expert and six novice evaluators. Our findings suggest that integrating LLM in Brainwriting could enhance both the ideation process and its outcome. We also provide evidence that LLMs can support idea evaluation. We conclude by discussing implications for HCI education and practice.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext de39f91b-b7fa-4383-9b37-0e4ed8b9888fCited by top-tier papers34
- Simulacrum of Stories: Examining Large Language Models as Qualitative Research ParticipantsShivani Kapania, William Agnew, Motahhare Eslami, Hoda Heidari et al.CHI 2025 · 59 citations
- Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature ReviewRock Yuren Pang, Hope Schroeder, Kynnedy Simone Smith, Solon Barocas et al.CHI 2025 · 51 citations
- Productive vs. Reflective: How Different Ways of Integrating AI into Design Workflows Affect Cognition and MotivationXiaotong (Tone) Xu, Arina Konnova, Bianca Gao, Cindy Peng et al.CHI 2025 · 41 citations
- How CO2STLY Is CHI? The Carbon Footprint of Generative AI in HCI Research and What We Should Do About ItNanna Inie, Jeanette Falk, Raghavendra SelvanCHI 2025 · 33 citations
- Exploring Collaboration Patterns and Strategies in Human-AI Co-creation through the Lens of Agency: A Scoping Review of the Top-tier HCI LiteratureShuning Zhang, Hui Wang, Xin YiCSCW 2025 · 31 citations
Builds on4
- Re-examining Whether, Why, and How Human-AI Interaction Is Uniquely Difficult to DesignQian Yang, Aaron Steinfeld, Carolyn P. Rosé, John ZimmermanCHI 2020 · 604 citations
- Tracing Conceptions of the Body in HCI: From User to More-Than-HumanSarah Homewood, Marika Hedemyr, Maja Fagerberg Ranten, Susan KozelCHI 2021 · 143 citations
- Designing Responsible AI: Adaptations of UX Practice to Meet Responsible AI ChallengesQiaosi Wang, Michael Madaio, Shaun K. Kane, Shivani Kapania et al.CHI 2023 · 90 citations
- PopBlends: Strategies for Conceptual Blending with Large Language ModelsSitong Wang, Savvas Petridis, Taeahn Kwon, Xiaojuan Ma et al.CHI 2023 · 57 citations
Related papers
- Intelligent Support Engages Writers Through Relevant Cognitive ProcessesAndreas Göldi, Thiemo Wambsganss, Seyed Parsa Neshaei, Roman RietscheCHI 2024 · 20 citations
- Human Creativity in the Age of LLMs: Randomized Experiments on Divergent and Convergent ThinkingHarsh Kumar, Jonathan Vincentius, Ewan Jordan, Ashton AndersonCHI 2025 · 107 citations
- Luminate: Structured Generation and Exploration of Design Space with Large Language Models for Human-AI Co-CreationSangho Suh, Meng Chen, Bryan Min, Toby Jia-Jun Li et al.CHI 2024 · 143 citations
- Social Dynamics of AI Support in Creative WritingKaty Ilonka Gero, Tao Long, Lydia B. ChiltonCHI 2023 · 125 citations
- The Value, Benefits, and Concerns of Generative AI-Powered Assistance in WritingZhuoyan Li, Chen Liang, Jing Peng, Ming YinCHI 2024 · 78 citations
