Timing Matters: How Using LLMs at Different Timings Influences Writers' Perceptions and Ideation Outcomes in AI-Assisted Ideation
Peinuan Qin, Chi-Lan Yang, Jingshu Li, Jing Wen, Yi-Chieh Lee
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely used to support ideation in the writing process. However, whether generating ideas with the help of LLMs leads to idea fixation or idea expansion is unclear. This study examines how different timings of LLM usage -either at the beginning or after independent ideation -affect people's perceptions and ideation outcomes in a writing task. In a controlled experiment with 60 participants, we found that using LLMs from the beginning reduced the number of original ideas and lowered creative self-efficacy and self-credit, mediated by changes in autonomy and ownership. We discuss the challenges and opportunities associated with using LLMs to assist in idea generation. We propose delaying the use of LLMs to support ideation while considering users' self-efficacy, autonomy, and ownership of the ideation outcomes.
• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 323698ac-6dbc-43a8-a6a1-5995f0581ecdCited by top-tier papers10
- Partnering with Generative AI: Experimental Evaluation of Model-Led and Human-Led Interaction in Human-AI Co-CreationSebastian Maier, Manuel Schneider, Stefan FeuerriegelCHI 2026 · 5 citations
- Investigating the Effects of LLM Use on Critical Thinking Under Time Constraints: Access Timing and Time AvailabilityJiayin Zhi, Harsh Kumar, Mina LeeCHI 2026 · 5 citations
- Authorship Drift: How Self-Efficacy and Trust Evolve During LLM-Assisted WritingYeon Su Park, Nadia Azzahra Putri Arvi, Seoyoung Kim, Juho KimCHI 2026 · 3 citations
- AI-exhibited Personality Traits Can Shape Human Self-concept through ConversationsJingshu Li, Tianqi Song, Nattapat Boonprakong, Zicheng Zhu et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Towards AI as Colleagues: Multi-Agent System Improves Structured Ideation ProcessesKexin Quan, Dina Albassam, Mengke Wu, Zijian Ding et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on7
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model CapabilitiesMina Lee, Percy Liang, Qian YangCHI 2022 · 340 citations
- Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users' ViewsMaurice Jakesch, Advait Bhat, Daniel Buschek, Lior Zalmanson et al.CHI 2023 · 249 citations
- Co-Writing Screenplays and Theatre Scripts with Language Models: Evaluation by Industry ProfessionalsPiotr Mirowski, Kory W. Mathewson, Jaylen Pittman, Richard EvansCHI 2023 · 235 citations
- The Effects of Generative AI on Design Fixation and Divergent ThinkingSamangi Wadinambiarachchi, Ryan M. Kelly, Saumya Pareek, Qiushi Zhou et al.CHI 2024 · 186 citations
Related papers
- Human Creativity in the Age of LLMs: Randomized Experiments on Divergent and Convergent ThinkingHarsh Kumar, Jonathan Vincentius, Ewan Jordan, Ashton AndersonCHI 2025 · 107 citations
- The Ideation-Execution Gap: Execution Outcomes of LLM-Generated versus Human Research IdeasChenglei Si, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Diyi YangICLR 2026 · 60 citations
- The Value, Benefits, and Concerns of Generative AI-Powered Assistance in WritingZhuoyan Li, Chen Liang, Jing Peng, Ming YinCHI 2024 · 78 citations
- "It Felt Like Having a Second Mind": Investigating Human-AI Co-creativity in Prewriting with Large Language ModelsQian Wan, Siying Hu, Yu Zhang, Piaohong Wang et al.CSCW 2024 · 86 citations
- Intelligent Support Engages Writers Through Relevant Cognitive ProcessesAndreas Göldi, Thiemo Wambsganss, Seyed Parsa Neshaei, Roman RietscheCHI 2024 · 20 citations
