Lune

CHI2025Top-tier venue

Timing Matters: How Using LLMs at Different Timings Influences Writers' Perceptions and Ideation Outcomes in AI-Assisted Ideation

Peinuan Qin, Chi-Lan Yang, Jingshu Li, Jing Wen, Yi-Chieh Lee

2025Year
19Citations
10Top-tier citations

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely used to support ideation in the writing process. However, whether generating ideas with the help of LLMs leads to idea fixation or idea expansion is unclear. This study examines how different timings of LLM usage -either at the beginning or after independent ideation -affect people's perceptions and ideation outcomes in a writing task. In a controlled experiment with 60 participants, we found that using LLMs from the beginning reduced the number of original ideas and lowered creative self-efficacy and self-credit, mediated by changes in autonomy and ownership. We discuss the challenges and opportunities associated with using LLMs to assist in idea generation. We propose delaying the use of LLMs to support ideation while considering users' self-efficacy, autonomy, and ownership of the ideation outcomes.

• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 323698ac-6dbc-43a8-a6a1-5995f0581ecd

Cited by top-tier papers10

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on7

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines