On the Risks of Collecting Multidimensional Data Under Local Differential Privacy
Héber Hwang Arcolezi, Sébastien Gambs, Jean-François Couchot, Catuscia Palamidessi
Abstract
The private collection of multiple statistics from a population is a fundamental statistical problem. One possible approach to realize this is to rely on the local model of differential privacy (LDP). Numerous LDP protocols have been developed for the task of frequency estimation of single and multiple attributes. These studies mainly focused on improving the utility of the algorithms to ensure the server performs the estimations accurately. In this paper, we investigate privacy threats (re-identification and attribute inference attacks) against LDP protocols for multidimensional data following two state-of-the-art solutions for frequency estimation of multiple attributes. To broaden the scope of our study, we have also experimentally assessed five widely used LDP protocols, namely, generalized randomized response, optimal local hashing, subset selection, RAPPOR and optimal unary encoding. Finally, we also proposed a countermeasure that improves both utility and robustness against the identified threats. Our contributions can help practitioners aiming to collect users' statistics privately to decide which LDP mechanism best fits their needs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dd493384-59d8-401b-88d4-98b2a5fb4a7eCited by top-tier papers7
- Interpolation-Based Optimization for Enforcing lp-Norm Metric Differential Privacy in Continuous and Fine-Grained DomainsChenxi QiuUSENIX Security 2026 · 3 citations
- Private Frequency Estimation via Residue Number SystemsHéber Hwang ArcoleziAAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Data Poisoning Attacks to Locally Differentially Private Frequent Itemset Mining ProtocolsWei Tong, Haoyu Chen, Jiacheng Niu, Sheng ZhongCCS 2024 · 2 citations
- Understanding Disclosure Risk in Differential Privacy with Applications to Noise Calibration and AuditingPatricia Guerra-Balboa, Annika Sauer, Héber Hwang Arcolezi, Thorsten StrufeVLDB 2026
- Dependency Triad: A Metric to Quantify the Dependencies Between Attributes for Local Differential PrivacySandaru Jayawardana, Sennur Ulukus, Ming Ding, Kanchana ThilakarathnaCCS 2026
Builds on11
- Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine LearningFrances Ding, Moritz Hardt, John Miller, Ludwig SchmidtNeurIPS 2021 · 671 citations
- Locally Differentially Private Protocols for Frequency EstimationTianhao Wang, Jeremiah Blocki, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaUSENIX Security 2017 · 629 citations
- Locally Differentially Private Frequent Itemset MiningTianhao Wang, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaS&P 2018 · 196 citations
- CALM: Consistent Adaptive Local Marginal for Marginal Release under Local Differential PrivacyZhikun Zhang, Tianhao Wang, Ninghui Li, Shibo He et al.CCS 2018 · 130 citations
- Manipulation Attacks in Local Differential PrivacyAlbert Cheu, Adam D. Smith, Jonathan R. UllmanS&P 2021 · 122 citations
Related papers
- Revisiting Locally Differentially Private Protocols: Towards Better Trade-Offs in Privacy, Utility, and Attack ResistanceHéber Hwang Arcolezi, Sébastien GambsICDE 2026
- Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Key-Value DataYongji Wu, Xiaoyu Cao, Jinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang GongUSENIX Security 2022
- LDPRecover: Recovering Frequencies from Poisoning Attacks Against Local Differential PrivacyXinyue Sun, Qingqing Ye, Haibo Hu, Jiawei Duan et al.ICDE 2024 · 21 citations
- Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy ProtocolsXiaoyu Cao, Jinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang GongUSENIX Security 2021 · 100 citations
- PCKV: Locally Differentially Private Correlated Key-Value Data Collection with Optimized UtilityXiaolan Gu, Ming Li, Yueqiang Cheng, Li Xiong et al.USENIX Security 2020
