USENIX Security2022Top-tier venue
Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Key-Value Data
Yongji Wu, Xiaoyu Cao, Jinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang Gong
Abstract
Local Differential Privacy (LDP) protocols enable an untrusted server to perform privacy-preserving, federated data analytics. Various LDP protocols have been developed for different types of data such as categorical data, numerical data, and key-value data. Due to their distributed settings, LDP protocols are fundamentally vulnerable to poisoning attacks, in which fake users manipulate the server's analytics results via sending carefully crafted data to the server. However, existing poisoning attacks focused on LDP protocols for simple data types such as categorical and numerical data, leaving the security of LDP protocols for more advanced data types such as key-value data unexplored. In this work, we aim to bridge the gap by introducing novel poisoning attacks to LDP protocols for key-value data. In such a LDP protocol, a server aims to simultaneously estimate the frequency and mean value of each key among some users, each of whom possesses a set of key-value pairs. Our poisoning attacks aim to simultaneously maximize the frequencies and mean values of some attacker-chosen target keys via sending carefully crafted data from some fake users to the sever. Specifically, since our attacks have two objectives, we formulate them as a two-objective optimization problem. Moreover, we propose a method to approximately solve the two-objective optimization problem, from which we obtain the optimal crafted data the fake users should send to the server. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our attacks to three LDP protocols for key-value data both theoretically and empirically. We also explore two defenses against our attacks, which are effective in some scenarios but have limited effectiveness in other scenarios. Our results highlight the needs for new defenses against our poisoning attacks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6be43e28-0450-4ba6-9068-a2d76f7f1686Cited by top-tier papers15
- On the Risks of Collecting Multidimensional Data Under Local Differential PrivacyHéber Hwang Arcolezi, Sébastien Gambs, Jean-François Couchot, Catuscia PalamidessiVLDB 2023 · 22 citations
- LDPRecover: Recovering Frequencies from Poisoning Attacks Against Local Differential PrivacyXinyue Sun, Qingqing Ye, Haibo Hu, Jiawei Duan et al.ICDE 2024 · 21 citations
- Differential Aggregation against General Colluding AttackersRong Du, Qingqing Ye, Yue Fu, Haibo Hu et al.ICDE 2023 · 11 citations
- Data Poisoning Attacks to Locally Differentially Private Frequent Itemset Mining ProtocolsWei Tong, Haoyu Chen, Jiacheng Niu, Sheng ZhongCCS 2024 · 2 citations
- Augmented Shuffle Differential Privacy Protocols for Large-Domain Categorical and Key-Value DataTakao Murakami, Yuichi Sei, Reo EriguchiNDSS 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on17
- Trojaning Attack on Neural NetworksYingqi Liu, Shiqing Ma, Yousra Aafer, Wen-Chuan Lee et al.NDSS 2018 · 1,377 citations
- Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression LearningMatthew Jagielski, Alina Oprea, Battista Biggio, Chang Liu et al.S&P 2018 · 867 citations
- Locally Differentially Private Protocols for Frequency EstimationTianhao Wang, Jeremiah Blocki, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaUSENIX Security 2017 · 629 citations
- Heavy Hitter Estimation over Set-Valued Data with Local Differential PrivacyZhan Qin, Yin Yang, Ting Yu, Issa Khalil et al.CCS 2016 · 344 citations
- Locally Differentially Private Frequent Itemset MiningTianhao Wang, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaS&P 2018 · 196 citations
Related papers
- Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy ProtocolsXiaoyu Cao, Jinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang GongUSENIX Security 2021 · 100 citations
- Fine-grained Poisoning Attack to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Mean and Variance EstimationXiaoguang Li, Ninghui Li, Wenhai Sun, Neil Zhenqiang Gong et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Fine-Grained Manipulation Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Range QueryXinyu Li, Wenda Chen, Xuebin RenICDE 2026
- Revisiting Locally Differentially Private Protocols: Towards Better Trade-Offs in Privacy, Utility, and Attack ResistanceHéber Hwang Arcolezi, Sébastien GambsICDE 2026
- Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy for Ranking EstimationPei Zhan, Peng Tang, Yangzhuo Li, Puwen Wei et al.CCS 2025
