Augmented Shuffle Differential Privacy Protocols for Large-Domain Categorical and Key-Value Data
Takao Murakami, Yuichi Sei, Reo Eriguchi
Abstract
Shuffle DP (Differential Privacy) protocols provide high accuracy and privacy by introducing a shuffler who randomly shuffles data in a distributed system. However, most shuffle DP protocols are vulnerable to two attacks: collusion attacks by the data collector and users and data poisoning attacks. A recent study addresses this issue by introducing an augmented shuffle DP protocol, where users do not add noise and the shuffler performs random sampling and dummy data addition. However, it focuses on frequency estimation over categorical data with a small domain and cannot be applied to a large domain due to prohibitively high communication and computational costs. In this paper, we fill this gap by introducing a novel augmented shuffle DP protocol called the FME (Filtering-with-Multiple-Encryption) protocol. Our FME protocol uses a hash function to filter out unpopular items and then accurately calculates frequencies for popular items. To perform this within one round of interaction between users and the shuffler, our protocol carefully communicates within a system using multiple encryption. We also apply our FME protocol to more advanced KV (Key-Value) statistics estimation with an additional technique to reduce bias. For both categorical and KV data, we prove that our protocol provides computational DP, high robustness to the above two attacks, accuracy, and efficiency. We show the effectiveness of our proposals through comparisons with twelve existing protocols.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 16404a33-8358-4838-9596-e6f5f5492869Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on22
- Locally Differentially Private Protocols for Frequency EstimationTianhao Wang, Jeremiah Blocki, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaUSENIX Security 2017 · 629 citations
- Heavy Hitter Estimation over Set-Valued Data with Local Differential PrivacyZhan Qin, Yin Yang, Ting Yu, Issa Khalil et al.CCS 2016 · 344 citations
- PrivKV: Key-Value Data Collection with Local Differential PrivacyQingqing Ye, Haibo Hu, Xiaofeng Meng, Huadi ZhengS&P 2019 · 178 citations
- Manipulation Attacks in Local Differential PrivacyAlbert Cheu, Adam D. Smith, Jonathan R. UllmanS&P 2021 · 122 citations
- Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy ProtocolsXiaoyu Cao, Jinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang GongUSENIX Security 2021 · 100 citations
Related papers
- Augmented Shuffle Protocols for Accurate and Robust Frequency Estimation Under Differential PrivacyTakao Murakami, Yuichi Sei, Reo EriguchiS&P 2025
- High-Accuracy, Poisoning-Resilient Frequency Estimation in the Shuffle ModelShaoqiang Wu, Jingyu Jia, Yikuan Zhu, Xinhao Li et al.USENIX Security 2026
- Defense against Poisoning Attacks under Shuffle-DPSiyi Wang, Qiyao Luo, Yihua Hu, Lixu Wang et al.SIGMOD 2026 · 1 citation
- Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Key-Value DataYongji Wu, Xiaoyu Cao, Jinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang GongUSENIX Security 2022
- Data Poisoning Attacks to Locally Differentially Private Frequent Itemset Mining ProtocolsWei Tong, Haoyu Chen, Jiacheng Niu, Sheng ZhongCCS 2024 · 2 citations
