Private Frequency Estimation via Residue Number Systems
Héber Hwang Arcolezi
Abstract
We present ModularSubsetSelection (MSS), a new algorithm for locally differentially private (LDP) frequency estimation. Given a universe of size k and n users, our ε-LDP mechanism encodes each input via a Residue Number System (RNS) over ℓ pairwise-coprime moduli m0, . . . , m ℓ-1 , and reports a randomly chosen index j ∈ [ℓ] along with the perturbed residue using the statistically optimal Sub-setSelection (SS) (Wang et al. 2016) . This design reduces the user communication cost from Θ ω log 2 (k/ω) bits required by standard SS (with ω ≈ k/(e ε + 1)) down to ⌈log 2 ℓ⌉ + ⌈log 2 mj⌉ bits, where mj < k. Server-side decoding runs in Θ(n + rkℓ) time, where r is the number of LSMR (Fong and Saunders 2011) iterations. In practice, with well-conditioned moduli (i.e., constant r and ℓ = Θ(log k)), this becomes Θ(n + k log k). We prove that MSS achieves worst-case MSE within a constant factor of state-of-the-art protocols such as SS and ProjectiveGeometryResponse (PGR) (Feldman et al. 2022) , while avoiding the algebraic prerequisites and dynamic-programming decoder required by PGR. Empirically, MSS matches the estimation accuracy of SS, PGR, and RAPPOR (Erlingsson, Pihur, and Korolova 2014) across realistic (k, ε) settings, while offering faster decoding than PGR and shorter user messages than SS. Lastly, by sampling from multiple moduli and reporting only a single perturbed residue, MSS achieves the lowest reconstructionattack success rate among all evaluated LDP protocols.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3fcf9de1-ac43-4031-bb63-532f5fef5d63Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- Locally Differentially Private Protocols for Frequency EstimationTianhao Wang, Jeremiah Blocki, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaUSENIX Security 2017 · 629 citations
- Bounding training data reconstruction in DP-SGDJamie Hayes, Borja Balle, Saeed MahloujifarNeurIPS 2023 · 73 citations
- Private frequency estimation via projective geometryVitaly Feldman, Jelani Nelson, Huy L. Nguyen, Kunal TalwarICML 2022 · 28 citations
- On the Risks of Collecting Multidimensional Data Under Local Differential PrivacyHéber Hwang Arcolezi, Sébastien Gambs, Jean-François Couchot, Catuscia PalamidessiVLDB 2023 · 22 citations
- Revisiting Locally Differentially Private Protocols: Towards Better Trade-Offs in Privacy, Utility, and Attack ResistanceHéber Hwang Arcolezi, Sébastien GambsICDE 2026
Related papers
- Sparse Estimation Under Local Differential Privacy at All Privacy LevelsPuning Zhao, Qingqing Ye, Shaowei Wang, Jun Feng et al.S&P 2026 · 1 citation
- Lossless Compression of Efficient Private Local RandomizersVitaly Feldman, Kunal TalwarICML 2021 · 43 citations
- Frequency Estimation Under Multiparty Differential Privacy: One-shot and StreamingZiyue Huang, Yuan Qiu, Ke Yi, Graham CormodeVLDB 2022 · 28 citations
- Breaking the Communication-Privacy-Accuracy TrilemmaWei-Ning Chen, Peter Kairouz, Ayfer ÖzgürNeurIPS 2020 · 144 citations
- Locally Differentially Private Frequency Estimation Based on Convolution FrameworkHuiyu Fang, Liquan Chen, Yali Liu, Yuan GaoS&P 2023
