STREAM: Spatio-TempoRal Evaluation and Analysis Metric for Video Generative Models
Pum Jun Kim, Seojun Kim, Jaejun Yoo
Abstract
Image generative models have made significant progress in generating realistic and diverse images, supported by comprehensive guidance from various evaluation metrics. However, current video generative models struggle to generate even short video clips, with limited tools that provide insights for improvements. Current video evaluation metrics are simple adaptations of image metrics by switching the embeddings with video embedding networks, which may underestimate the unique characteristics of video. Our analysis reveals that the widely used Frechet Video Distance (FVD) has a stronger emphasis on the spatial aspect than the temporal naturalness of video and is inherently constrained by the input size of the embedding networks used, limiting it to 16 frames. Additionally, it demonstrates considerable instability and diverges from human evaluations. To address the limitations, we propose STREAM, a new video evaluation metric uniquely designed to independently evaluate spatial and temporal aspects. This feature allows comprehensive analysis and evaluation of video generative models from various perspectives, unconstrained by video length. We provide analytical and experimental evidence demonstrating that STREAM provides an effective evaluation tool for both visual and temporal quality of videos, offering insights into area of improvement for video generative models. To the best of our knowledge, STREAM is the first evaluation metric that can separately assess the temporal and spatial aspects of videos. Our code is available at https://github.com/pro2nit/STREAM.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dc9375b6-d1a8-4487-97ff-b077915181c5Cited by top-tier papers3
- Video Analysis and Generation via a Semantic Progress FunctionGal Metzer, Sagi Polaczek, Ali Mahdavi-Amiri, Raja Giryes et al.SIGGRAPH 2026
- High-Quality Joint Image and Video Tokenization with Causal VAEDawit Mureja Argaw, Xian Liu, Qinsheng Zhang, Joon Son Chung et al.ICLR 2025
- Direct Motion Models for Assessing Generated VideosKelsey R. Allen, Carl Doersch, Guangyao Zhou, Mohammed Suhail et al.ICML 2025
Builds on10
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative ModelsMuhammad Ferjad Naeem, Seong Joon Oh, Youngjung Uh, Yunjey Choi et al.ICML 2020 · 553 citations
- MCVD - Masked Conditional Video Diffusion for Prediction, Generation, and InterpolationVikram Voleti, Alexia Jolicoeur-Martineau, Chris PalNeurIPS 2022 · 434 citations
- StyleGAN-XL: Scaling StyleGAN to Large Diverse DatasetsAxel Sauer, Katja Schwarz, Andreas GeigerSIGGRAPH 2022 · 326 citations
- Generating Videos with Dynamics-aware Implicit Generative Adversarial NetworksSihyun Yu, Jihoon Tack, Sangwoo Mo, Hyunsu Kim et al.ICLR 2022 · 227 citations
Related papers
- Beyond FVD: An Enhanced Evaluation Metrics for Video Generation Distribution QualityGe Ya Luo, Gian Mario Favero, Zhi Hao Luo, Alexia Jolicoeur-Martineau et al.ICLR 2025
- VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative ModelsZiqi Huang, Yinan He, Jiashuo Yu, Fan Zhang et al.CVPR 2024
- Rethinking FID: Towards a Better Evaluation Metric for Image GenerationSadeep Jayasumana, Srikumar Ramalingam, Andreas Veit, Daniel Glasner et al.CVPR 2024
- On the Content Bias in Fréchet Video DistanceSongwei Ge, Aniruddha Mahapatra, Gaurav Parmar, Jun-Yan Zhu et al.CVPR 2024
- Fréchet Wavelet Distance: A Domain-Agnostic Metric for Image GenerationLokesh Veeramacheneni, Moritz Wolter, Hilde Kuehne, Juergen GallICLR 2025
