Data Ethics Emergency Drill: A Toolbox for Discussing Responsible AI for Industry Teams
Vanessa Aisyahsari Hanschke, Dylan Rees, Merve Alanyali, David Hopkinson, Paul Marshall
Abstract
Researchers urge technology practitioners such as data scientists to consider the impacts and ethical implications of algorithmic decisions. However, unlike programming, statistics, and data management, discussion of ethical implications is rarely included in standard data science training. To begin to address this gap, we designed and tested a toolbox called the data ethics emergency drill (DEED) to help data science teams discuss and reflect on the ethical implications of their work. The DEED is a roleplay of a fictional ethical emergency scenario that is contextually situated in the team’s specific workplace and applications. This paper outlines the DEED toolbox and describes three studies carried out with two different data science teams that iteratively shaped its design. Our findings show that practitioners can apply lessons learnt from the roleplay to real-life situations, and how the DEED opened up conversations around ethics and values.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext db434b8a-8fa6-4450-8d0e-a12c3f03698bCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- Interpreting Interpretability: Understanding Data Scientists' Use of Interpretability Tools for Machine LearningHarmanpreet Kaur, Harsha Nori, Samuel Jenkins, Rich Caruana et al.CHI 2020 · 541 citations
- Co-Designing Checklists to Understand Organizational Challenges and Opportunities around Fairness in AIMichael A. Madaio, Luke Stark, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna M. WallachCHI 2020 · 428 citations
- Seeing Like a Toolkit: How Toolkits Envision the Work of AI EthicsRichmond Y. Wong, Michael A. Madaio, Nick MerrillCSCW 2023 · 108 citations
- Designing Responsible AI: Adaptations of UX Practice to Meet Responsible AI ChallengesQiaosi Wang, Michael Madaio, Shaun K. Kane, Shivani Kapania et al.CHI 2023 · 90 citations
- "It is currently hodgepodge": Examining AI/ML Practitioners' Challenges during Co-production of Responsible AI ValuesRama Adithya Varanasi, Nitesh GoyalCHI 2023 · 52 citations
Related papers
- Power and Play: Investigating "License to Critique" in Teams' AI Ethics DiscussionsDavid Gray Widder, Laura Dabbish, James D. Herbsleb, Nikolas MartelaroCSCW 2024 · 13 citations
- Datasheets for Datasets help ML Engineers Notice and Understand Ethical Issues in Training DataKaren L. BoydCSCW 2021 · 68 citations
- How do Data Science Workers Collaborate? Roles, Workflows, and ToolsAmy X. Zhang, Michael J. Muller, Dakuo WangCSCW 2020 · 260 citations
- Why Stop at One Error? Benchmarking LLMs as Data Science Code Debuggers for Multi-Hop and Multi-Bug ErrorsZhiyu Yang, Shuo Wang, Yukun Yan, Yang DengEMNLP 2025
- Navigating Ethical Dilemmas: The Value Landscape Behind Fieldwork DecisionsInês Silva, Joana Couto da Silva, Francisco Nunes, Ricardo MeloCHI 2026 · 2 citations
