"Why do we do this?": Moral Stress and the Affective Experience of Ethics in Practice
Sonja Rattay, Ville Vakkuri, Marco C. Rozendaal, Irina Shklovski
Abstract
A plethora of toolkits, checklists, and workshops have been developed to bridge the well-documented gap between AI ethics principles and practice. Yet little is known about effects of such interventions on practitioners. We conducted an ethnographic investigation in a major European city organization that developed and works to integrate an ethics toolkit into city operations. We find that the integration of ethics tools by technical teams destabilises their boundaries, roles, and mandates around responsibilities and decisions. This lead to emotional discomfort and feelings of vulnerability, which neither toolkit designers nor the organization had accounted for. We leverage the concept of moral stress to argue that this affective experience is a core challenge to the successful integration of ethics tools in technical practice. Even in this best case scenario, organisational structures were not able to deal with moral stress that resulted from attempts to implement responsible technology development practices.
• Social and professional topics → Codes of ethics; • Humancentered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on13
- Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User ExperiencesQ. Vera Liao, Daniel M. Gruen, Sarah MillerCHI 2020 · 758 citations
- Co-Designing Checklists to Understand Organizational Challenges and Opportunities around Fairness in AIMichael A. Madaio, Luke Stark, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna M. WallachCHI 2020 · 428 citations
- Seeing Like a Toolkit: How Toolkits Envision the Work of AI EthicsRichmond Y. Wong, Michael A. Madaio, Nick MerrillCSCW 2023 · 108 citations
- Investigating How Practitioners Use Human-AI Guidelines: A Case Study on the People + AI GuidebookNur Yildirim, Mahima Pushkarna, Nitesh Goyal, Martin Wattenberg et al.CHI 2023 · 103 citations
- Designing Responsible AI: Adaptations of UX Practice to Meet Responsible AI ChallengesQiaosi Wang, Michael Madaio, Shaun K. Kane, Shivani Kapania et al.CHI 2023 · 90 citations
Related papers
- Who Should Act? Distancing and Vulnerability in Technology Practitioners' Accounts of Ethical ResponsibilityKristina Popova, Clàudia Figueras, Kristina Höök, Airi LampinenCSCW 2024 · 22 citations
- A Scoping Study of Evaluation Practices for Responsible AI Tools: Steps Towards Effectiveness EvaluationsGlen Berman, Nitesh Goyal, Michael MadaioCHI 2024 · 40 citations
- Guidelines for Integrating Value Sensitive Design in Responsible AI ToolkitsMalak Sadek, Marios Constantinides, Daniele Quercia, Céline MougenotCHI 2024 · 49 citations
- Building an Ethics-Focused Action Plan: Roles, Process Moves, and TrajectoriesColin M. Gray, Ike Obi, Shruthi Sai Chivukula, Ziqing Li et al.CHI 2024 · 12 citations
- A Feminist Care Ethics Toolkit for Community-Based Design: Bridging Theory and PracticeAna O. Henriques, Anna R. L. Carter, Beatriz Severes, Reem Talhouk et al.CHI 2025 · 27 citations
