Lune

ACL Findings2025

DOVE: A Large-Scale Multi-Dimensional Predictions Dataset Towards Meaningful LLM Evaluation

Eliya Habba, Ofir Arviv, Itay Itzhak, Yotam Perlitz, Elron Bandel, Leshem Choshen, Michal Shmueli-Scheuer, Gabriel Stanovsky

Abstract

Recent work found that LLMs are sensitive to a wide range of arbitrary prompt dimensions, including the type of delimiters, answer enumerators, instruction wording, and more. This throws into question popular single-prompt evaluation practices. We present DOVE (Dataset Of Variation Evaluation) a large-scale dataset containing prompt perturbations of various evaluation benchmarks. In contrast to previous work, we examine LLM sensitivity from an holistic perspective, and assess the joint effects of perturbations along various dimensions, resulting in thousands of perturbations per instance. We evaluate several model families against DOVE, leading to several findings, including efficient methods for choosing well-performing prompts, observing that few-shot examples reduce sensitivity, and identifying instances which are inherently hard across all perturbations. DOVE consists of more than 250M prompt perturbations and model outputs, which we make publicly available to spur a community-wide effort toward meaningful, robust, and efficient evaluation. Browse the data, contribute, and more: https://slab-nlp.github.io/DOVE/

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 4 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers4

  1. When AI Benchmarks Plateau: A Systematic Study of Benchmark SaturationMubashara Akhtar, Anka Reuel, Prajna Soni, Sanchit Ahuja et al.ICML 2026 · 22 citations
  2. Empty Shelves or Lost Keys? Recall Is the Bottleneck for Parametric FactualityNitay Calderon, Eyal Ben-David, Zorik Gekhman, Eran Ofek et al.ICML 2026 · 8 citations
  3. SCAN: Structured Capability Assessment and Navigation for LLMsZongqi Wang, Tianle Gu, Chen Gong, Xin Tian et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
  4. A Hitchhiker's Guide to Scaling Law EstimationLeshem Choshen, Yang Zhang, Jacob AndreasICML 2025

Builds on16

  1. Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
  2. Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-shot Performance of Language ModelsZihao Zhao, Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Dan Klein et al.ICML 2021 · 1,843 citations
  3. Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order SensitivityYao Lu, Max Bartolo, Alastair Moore, Sebastian Riedel et al.ACL 2022 · 1,494 citations
  4. Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentionWoosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng et al.SOSP 2023 · 1,016 citations
  5. Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingMelanie Sclar, Yejin Choi, Yulia Tsvetkov, Alane SuhrICLR 2024 · 682 citations

Related papers

  1. Efficient multi-prompt evaluation of LLMsFelipe Maia Polo, Ronald Xu, Lucas Weber, Mírian Silva et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 93 citations
  2. POSIX: A Prompt Sensitivity Index For Large Language ModelsAnwoy Chatterjee, H. S. V. N. S. Kowndinya Renduchintala, Sumit Bhatia, Tanmoy ChakrabortyEMNLP Findings 2024 · 36 citations
  3. ProSA: Assessing and Understanding the Prompt Sensitivity of LLMsJingming Zhuo, Songyang Zhang, Xinyu Fang, Haodong Duan et al.EMNLP Findings 2024 · 78 citations
  4. ReliableEval: A Recipe for Stochastic LLM Evaluation via Method of MomentsGili Lior, Eliya Habba, Shahar Levy, Avi Caciularu et al.EMNLP Findings 2025 · 2 citations
  5. On the Worst Prompt Performance of Large Language ModelsBowen Cao, Deng Cai, Zhisong Zhang, Yuexian Zou et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 65 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines