Lune

EMNLP Findings2024

ProSA: Assessing and Understanding the Prompt Sensitivity of LLMs

Jingming Zhuo, Songyang Zhang, Xinyu Fang, Haodong Duan, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across various tasks, but their performance is highly sensitive to the prompts utilized. This variability poses challenges for accurate assessment and user satisfaction. Current research frequently overlooks instance-level prompt variations and their implications on subjective evaluations. To address these shortcomings, we introduce ProSA, a framework designed to evaluate and comprehend prompt sensitivity in LLMs. ProSA incorporates a novel sensitivity metric, PromptSensiScore, and leverages decoding confidence to elucidate underlying mechanisms. Our extensive study, spanning multiple tasks, uncovers that prompt sensitivity fluctuates across datasets and models, with larger models exhibiting enhanced robustness. We observe that few-shot examples can alleviate this sensitivity issue, and subjective evaluations are also susceptible to prompt sensitivities, particularly in complex, reasoningoriented tasks. Furthermore, our findings indicate that higher model confidence correlates with increased prompt robustness. We believe this work will serve as a helpful tool in studying prompt sensitivity of LLMs. The project is released at: https://github.com/ open-compass/ProSA.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 18 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers18

  1. Understanding the Prompt SensitivityYang Liu, Chenhui ChuACL 2026 · 192 citations
  2. Quantifying and Improving the Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Against Spurious Features in Grounding DataShiping Yang, Jie Wu, Wenbiao Ding, Ning Wu et al.ACL 2026 · 9 citations
  3. RAGTrace: Understanding and Refining Retrieval-Generation Dynamics in Retrieval-Augmented GenerationSizhe Cheng, Jiaping Li, Huanchen Wang, Yuxin MaUIST 2025 · 6 citations
  4. Inertia in Moral and Value Judgments of Large Language ModelsBruce W. Lee, Yeongheon Lee, Hyunsoo ChoACL 2026 · 5 citations
  5. Can we trust LLM Self-Explanations for Entity Resolution?Tommaso Teofili, Donatella Firmani, Nick Koudas, Paolo Merialdo et al.VLDB 2026 · 2 citations

Builds on3

  1. BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
  2. Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingMelanie Sclar, Yejin Choi, Yulia Tsvetkov, Alane SuhrICLR 2024 · 682 citations
  3. LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation DatasetLianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Tianle Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 419 citations

Related papers

  1. POSIX: A Prompt Sensitivity Index For Large Language ModelsAnwoy Chatterjee, H. S. V. N. S. Kowndinya Renduchintala, Sumit Bhatia, Tanmoy ChakrabortyEMNLP Findings 2024 · 36 citations
  2. Evaluating and Explaining Prompt Sensitivity of LLMs Using InteractionsRuiyang Qin, Qingzhuo Wang, Tian Wang, Zhihua Wei et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
  3. DOVE: A Large-Scale Multi-Dimensional Predictions Dataset Towards Meaningful LLM EvaluationEliya Habba, Ofir Arviv, Itay Itzhak, Yotam Perlitz et al.ACL Findings 2025
  4. Efficient multi-prompt evaluation of LLMsFelipe Maia Polo, Ronald Xu, Lucas Weber, Mírian Silva et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 93 citations
  5. AXCEL: Automated eXplainable Consistency Evaluation using LLMsP. Aditya Sreekar, Sahil Verma, Suransh Chopra, Abhishek Persad et al.EMNLP Findings 2024 · 5 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines