SCAN: Structured Capability Assessment and Navigation for LLMs
Zongqi Wang, Tianle Gu, Chen Gong, Xin Tian, Siqi Bao, Yujiu Yang
Abstract
Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) has become increasingly important, with automatic evaluation benchmarks gaining prominence as alternatives to human evaluation. While existing research has focused on approximating model rankings, such benchmarks fail to provide users and developers with a comprehensive and fine-grained understanding of a specific model's capabilities. To fill this gap, we propose SCAN (Structured Capability Assessment and Navigation), a practical framework that enables detailed characterization of LLM capabilities through comprehensive and fine-grained evaluation. SCAN incorporates four key components: (1) TaxBuilder, which extracts capability-indicating tags from extensive queries to construct a hierarchical taxonomy automatically; (2) RealMix, a query synthesis and filtering mechanism that ensures sufficient evaluation data for each capability tag; (3) a suite of visualization and analysis tools that facilitate efficient navigation and analysis of model capabilities; and (4) a PC-based (Pre-Comparison-derived Criteria) LLM-as-a-Judge approach that achieves significantly higher accuracy compared to classic LLM-as-a-Judge method. Using SCAN, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of 21 mainstream LLMs. Our detailed analysis of the GPT-OSS family reveals substantial performance variations, even within sub-capabilities belonging to the same category of capability. This finding highlights the importance of fine-grained evaluation in accurately understanding LLM behavior. Project homepage and resources are available at https://github.com/liudan193/SCAN.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4db04bf9-a155-4bad-b5bb-a0e32bf6e173Cited by top-tier papers2
- Reward Modeling from Natural Language Human FeedbackZongqi Wang, Rui Wang, Yuchuan Wu, Yiyao Yu et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
- Beyond Ranking: Fine-Grained Diagnostics and Self-Improvement for MLLMsMingze Xu, Zijing Zhao, Qiming Peng, Houwen Peng et al.ACL 2026
Builds on8
- Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated InstructionsYizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu et al.ACL 2023 · 540 citations
- MixEval: Deriving Wisdom of the Crowd from LLM Benchmark MixturesJinjie Ni, Fuzhao Xue, Xiang Yue, Yuntian Deng et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 88 citations
- Auto-Arena: Automating LLM Evaluations with Agent Peer Battles and Committee DiscussionsRuochen Zhao, Wenxuan Zhang, Yew Ken Chia, Weiwen Xu et al.ACL 2025 · 34 citations
- Hallu-PI: Evaluating Hallucination in Multi-modal Large Language Models within Perturbed InputsPeng Ding, Jingyu Wu, Jun Kuang, Dan Ma et al.ACM MM 2024 · 8 citations
- RMB: Comprehensively benchmarking reward models in LLM alignmentEnyu Zhou, Guodong Zheng, Binghai Wang, Zhiheng Xi et al.ICLR 2025
Related papers
- T-Eval: Evaluating the Tool Utilization Capability of Large Language Models Step by StepZehui Chen, Weihua Du, Wenwei Zhang, Kuikun Liu et al.ACL 2024 · 7 citations
- SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language ModelsZhexin Zhang, Leqi Lei, Lindong Wu, Rui Sun et al.ACL 2024
- SciEval: A Multi-Level Large Language Model Evaluation Benchmark for Scientific ResearchLiangtai Sun, Yang Han, Zihan Zhao, Da Ma et al.AAAI 2024 · 150 citations
- CriticEval: Evaluating Large-scale Language Model as CriticTian Lan, Wenwei Zhang, Chen Xu, Heyan Huang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 26 citations
- CodeScope: An Execution-based Multilingual Multitask Multidimensional Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Code Understanding and GenerationWeixiang Yan, Haitian Liu, Yunkun Wang, Yunzhe Li et al.ACL 2024
