Lune

EMNLP Findings2025

AirRAG: Autonomous Strategic Planning and Reasoning Steer Retrieval Augmented Generation

Wenfeng Feng, Chuzhan Hao, Yuewei Zhang, Guochao Jiang, Jingyi Song

Abstract

Leveraging the autonomous decision-making capabilities of large language models (LLMs) has demonstrated superior performance in reasoning tasks. However, despite the success of iterative or agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) techniques, these methods are often constrained to a single solution space when confronted with complex problems. In this paper, we propose a novel thinking pattern in RAG that integrates autonomous strategic planning with efficient reasoning actions, significantly activating intrinsic reasoning capabilities and expanding the solution space of specific tasks via Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), which we refer to as AirRAG. Specifically, our approach designs five fundamental reasoning actions, which are expanded to a broad tree-based reasoning space using MCTS. The approach also incorporates self-consistency verification to explore potential reasoning paths and inference scaling law. Additionally, computationally optimal strategies are employed to allocate more inference resources to key actions, thereby enhancing overall performance. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of AirRAG, showing significant performance gains on complex question-answering datasets. Furthermore, AirRAG is flexible and lightweight, making it easy to integrate with other advanced technologies and models.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 1 top-tier paper that cites it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers1

  1. Process vs. Outcome Reward: Which is Better for Agentic RAG Reinforcement LearningWenlin Zhang, Xiangyang Li, Kuicai Dong, Yichao Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 85 citations

Builds on21

  1. Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
  2. Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
  3. Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-ReflectionAkari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,798 citations
  4. Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language ModelsMaciej Besta, Nils Blach, Ales Kubicek, Robert Gerstenberger et al.AAAI 2024 · 1,292 citations
  5. Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant ContextFreda Shi, Xinyun Chen, Kanishka Misra, Nathan Scales et al.ICML 2023 · 970 citations

Related papers

  1. MCTS-RAG: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Monte Carlo Tree SearchYunhai Hu, Yilun Zhao, Chen Zhao, Arman CohanEMNLP Findings 2025 · 5 citations
  2. RATT: A Thought Structure for Coherent and Correct LLM ReasoningJinghan Zhang, Xiting Wang, Weijieying Ren, Lu Jiang et al.AAAI 2025 · 51 citations
  3. Self-Correcting RAG: Enhancing Faithfulness via MMKP Context Selection and NLI-Guided MCTSShijia Xu, Zhou Wu, Xiaolong Jia, Yu Wang et al.ACL Findings 2026
  4. InstructRAG: Leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Instruction Graphs for LLM-Based Task PlanningZheng Wang, Shu Xian Teo, Jun Jie Chew, Wei ShiSIGIR 2025 · 4 citations
  5. From Conflict to Consensus: Boosting Medical Reasoning via Multi-Round Agentic RAGWenhao Wu, Zhentao Tang, Yafu Li, Shixiong Kai et al.ICML 2026
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines