Process vs. Outcome Reward: Which is Better for Agentic RAG Reinforcement Learning
Wenlin Zhang, Xiangyang Li, Kuicai Dong, Yichao Wang, Pengyue Jia, Xiaopeng Li, Yingyi Zhang, Derong Xu, Zhaocheng Du, Huifeng Guo, Ruiming Tang, Xiangyu Zhao
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances the text generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by integrating external knowledge and up-to-date information. However, traditional RAG systems are limited by static workflows and lack the adaptability required for multistep reasoning and complex task management. To address these limitations, agentic RAG systems (e.g., DeepResearch) have been proposed, enabling dynamic retrieval strategies, iterative context refinement, and adaptive workflows for handling complex search queries beyond the capabilities of conventional RAG. Recent advances, such as Search-R1, have demonstrated promising gains using outcome-based reinforcement learning, where the correctness of the final answer serves as the reward signal. Nevertheless, such outcome-supervised agentic RAG methods face challenges including low exploration efficiency, gradient conflict, and sparse reward signals. To overcome these challenges, we propose to utilize fine-grained, process-level rewards to improve training stability, reduce computational costs, and enhance efficiency. Specifically, we introduce a novel method ReasonRAG that automatically constructs RAG-ProGuide, a high-quality dataset providing process-level rewards for (i) query generation, (ii) evidence extraction, and (iii) answer generation, thereby enhancing model inherent capabilities via process-supervised reinforcement learning. With the process-level policy optimization, the proposed framework empowers LLMs to autonomously invoke search, generate queries, extract relevant evidence, and produce final answers. Compared to existing approaches such as Search-R1 and traditional RAG systems, ReasonRAG, leveraging RAG-ProGuide, achieves superior performance on five benchmark datasets using only 5k training instances, significantly fewer than the 90k training instances required by Search-R1. Our code is available at https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/ReasonRAG.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f99eaf10-2195-4245-bb3a-29f285d715dfCited by top-tier papers11
- Tree Search for LLM Agent Reinforcement LearningYuxiang Ji, Ziyu Ma, Yong Wang, Guanhua Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 71 citations
- Information Gain-based Policy Optimization: A Simple and Effective Approach for Multi-Turn Search AgentsGuoqing Wang, Sunhao Dai, Guangze Ye, Zeyu Gan et al.ICLR 2026 · 37 citations
- SmartSearch: Process Reward-Guided Query Refinement for Search AgentsTongyu Wen, Guanting Dong, Zhicheng DouSIGIR 2026 · 13 citations
- Search-R2: Enhancing Search-Integrated Reasoning via Actor-Refiner CollaborationBowei He, Minda Hu, Zenan Xu, Hongru WANG et al.ICML 2026 · 9 citations
- Personalize Before Retrieve: LLM-based Personalized Query Expansion for User-Centric RetrievalYingyi Zhang, Pengyue Jia, Derong Xu, Yi Wen et al.AAAI 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on25
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-ReflectionAkari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,798 citations
Related papers
- GraphRAG-R1: Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Process-Constrained Reinforcement LearningChuanyue Yu, Kuo Zhao, Yuhan Li, Heng Chang et al.WWW 2026 · 8 citations
- HiPRAG: Hierarchical Process Rewards for Efficient Agentic Retrieval Augmented GenerationPeilin Wu, Mian Zhang, Kun Wan, Wentian Zhao et al.ICLR 2026 · 13 citations
- CP-Search: A Chain Progressive Search Training Framework Incentivizing the Cognitive Behaviors for Searching in LLMsZehua Wang, Shipeng Li, Buzhou TangAAAI 2026
- DynamicRAG: Leveraging Outputs of Large Language Model as Feedback for Dynamic Reranking in Retrieval-Augmented GenerationJiashuo Sun, Xianrui Zhong, Sizhe Zhou, Jiawei HanNeurIPS 2025 · 19 citations
- Graph-R1: Towards Agentic GraphRAG Framework via End-to-end Reinforcement LearningHaoran Luo, Haihong E, Guanting Chen, Qika Lin et al.ICML 2026 · 50 citations
