EMNLP Findings2025
R3-RAG: Learning Step-by-Step Reasoning and Retrieval for LLMs via Reinforcement Learning
Yuan Li, Qi Luo, Xiaonan Li, Bufan Li, Qinyuan Cheng, Bo Wang, Yining Zheng, Yuxin Wang, Zhangyue Yin, Xipeng Qiu
Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) integrates external knowledge with Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance factual correctness and mitigate hallucinations. However, dense retrievers often become the bottleneck of RAG systems due to their limited parameters compared to LLMs and their inability to perform step-by-step reasoning. While prompt-based iterative RAG attempts to address these limitations, it is constrained by human-designed workflows. To address these limitations, we propose R3-RAG, which uses Reinforcement learning to make the LLM learn how to Reason and Retrieve step-by-step, thus retrieving comprehensive external knowledge and leading to correct answers. R3-RAG is divided into two stages. We first use cold start to make the model learn the manner of iteratively interleaving reasoning and retrieval. Then we use reinforcement learning (RL) to further harness its ability to better explore the external retrieval environment. Specifically, we propose two rewards for R3-RAG: 1) answer correctness for outcome reward, which judges whether the trajectory leads to a correct answer; 2) relevance-based document verification for process reward, encouraging the model to retrieve documents that are relevant to the user question, through which we can let the model learn how to iteratively reason and retrieve relevant documents to get the correct answer. Experimental results show that R3-RAG significantly outperforms baselines and can transfer well to different retrievers.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 1 top-tier paper that cites it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Builds on15
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?Zhiqi Chen, Rui Lu, Andrew Zhao, Zhaokai Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1,109 citations
- Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant ContextOri Yoran, Tomer Wolfson, Ori Ram, Jonathan BerantICLR 2024 · 361 citations
- Active Retrieval Augmented GenerationZhengbao Jiang, Frank F. Xu, Luyu Gao, Zhiqing Sun et al.EMNLP 2023 · 315 citations
- Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language ModelsOfir Press, Muru Zhang, Sewon Min, Ludwig Schmidt et al.EMNLP Findings 2023 · 296 citations
Related papers
- Optimizing Retrieval for RAG via Reinforcement LearningJiawei Zhou, Lei ChenNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- A Survey of RAG-Reasoning Systems in Large Language ModelsYangning Li, Weizhi Zhang, Yuyao Yang, Wei-Chieh Huang et al.EMNLP Findings 2025 · 9 citations
- Improving Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningYiqun Chen, Lingyong Yan, Weiwei Sun, Xinyu Ma et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 47 citations
- Process vs. Outcome Reward: Which is Better for Agentic RAG Reinforcement LearningWenlin Zhang, Xiangyang Li, Kuicai Dong, Yichao Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 85 citations
- Graph-R1: Towards Agentic GraphRAG Framework via End-to-end Reinforcement LearningHaoran Luo, Haihong E, Guanting Chen, Qika Lin et al.ICML 2026 · 50 citations
