Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Context
Freda Shi, Xinyun Chen, Kanishka Misra, Nathan Scales, David Dohan, Ed H. Chi, Nathanael Schärli, Denny Zhou
Abstract
Large language models have achieved impressive performance on various natural language processing tasks. However, so far they have been evaluated primarily on benchmarks where all information in the input context is relevant for solving the task. In this work, we investigate the distractibility of large language models, i.e., how the model problem-solving accuracy can be influenced by irrelevant context. In particular, we introduce Grade-School Math with Irrelevant Context (GSM-IC), an arithmetic reasoning dataset with irrelevant information in the problem description. We use this benchmark to measure the distractibility of cutting-edge prompting techniques for large language models, and find that the model performance is dramatically decreased when irrelevant information is included. We also identify several approaches for mitigating this deficiency, such as decoding with self-consistency and adding to the prompt an instruction that tells the language model to ignore the irrelevant information. 1 Work done while FS and KM are student researchers at Google DeepMind. * Equal contribution 1 Google Deep-Mind
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0378b890-c530-4044-9256-42f144409afdCited by top-tier papers272
- Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-ReflectionAkari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,798 citations
- Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning YetJie Huang, Xinyun Chen, Swaroop Mishra, Huaixiu Steven Zheng et al.ICLR 2024 · 858 citations
- The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"Lukas Berglund, Meg Tong, Maximilian Kaufmann, Mikita Balesni et al.ICLR 2024 · 462 citations
- Can Language Models Solve Graph Problems in Natural Language?Heng Wang, Shangbin Feng, Tianxing He, Zhaoxuan Tan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 420 citations
- Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant ContextOri Yoran, Tomer Wolfson, Ori Ram, Jonathan BerantICLR 2024 · 361 citations
Builds on17
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
Related papers
- How Is LLM Reasoning Distracted by Irrelevant Context? An Analysis Using a Controlled BenchmarkMinglai Yang, Ethan Huang, Liang Zhang, Mihai Surdeanu et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem SolversQintong Li, Leyang Cui, Xueliang Zhao, Lingpeng Kong et al.ACL 2024 · 9 citations
- LLMs can be easily Confused by Instructional DistractionsYerin Hwang, Yongil Kim, Jahyun Koo, Taegwan Kang et al.ACL 2025
- Adaptive Distraction: Probing LLM Contextual Robustness with Automated Tree SearchYanbo Wang, Zixiang Xu, Yue Huang, Chujie Gao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- Can LLMs Solve Longer Math Word Problems Better?Xin Xu, Tong Xiao, Zitong Chao, Zhenya Huang et al.ICLR 2025
