Lune

EMNLP Findings2025

Language Models Can Easily Learn to Reason from Demonstrations

Dacheng Li, Shiyi Cao, Tyler Griggs, Shu Liu, Xiangxi Mo, Eric Tang, Sumanth Hegde, Kourosh Hakhamaneshi, Shishir G. Patil, Matei Zaharia, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Ion Stoica

Abstract

Large reasoning models (LRMs) tackle complex problems by following long chain-ofthoughts (Long CoT) that incorporate reflection, backtracking, and self-validation. However, the training techniques and data requirements to elicit Long CoT remain poorly understood. In this work, we find that language models can effectively learn Long CoT reasoning through data-efficient supervised finetuning (SFT) and further parameter-efficient low-rank adaptation (LoRA). Crucially, we find that the structure of Long CoT is critical to the learning process in this data-efficient fine-tuning process. Training on contentincorrect examples, e.g. those lead to incorrect answers or corrupted digits, still leads to significant performance gains. In contrast, training on structurally incorrect examples, e.g., with shuffled or deleted reasoning steps, yield smaller improvements or even degrade performance. The model, Sky-T1, and codes are available at https://github.com/ NovaSky-AI/SkyThought.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 4 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers4

  1. HalluCitation Matters: Revealing the Impact of Hallucinated References with 300 Hallucinated Papers in ACL ConferencesYusuke Sakai, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Taro WatanabeACL 2026 · 18 citations
  2. Effective Reasoning Chains Reduce Intrinsic DimensionalityArchiki Prasad, Mandar Joshi, Kenton Lee, Mohit Bansal et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
  3. How does Chain of Thought decompose complex tasks?Amrut Nadgir, Vijay Balasubramanian, Pratik ChaudhariICML 2026 · 1 citation
  4. Measuring and Mitigating Post-Hoc Rationalization in Reverse Chain-of-Thought GenerationGuangyue Peng, Zongchao Chen, Wen Luo, Yuntao Wen et al.ICML 2026

Builds on10

  1. Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
  2. LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
  3. Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
  4. Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
  5. STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With ReasoningEric Zelikman, Yuhuai Wu, Jesse Mu, Noah D. GoodmanNeurIPS 2022 · 1,126 citations

Related papers

  1. Activation Control for Efficiently Eliciting Long Chain-of-thought Ability of Language ModelsZekai Zhao, Qi Liu, Kun Zhou, Zihan Liu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
  2. Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought ReasoningShiming Yang, Yuxuan Tong, Xinyao Niu, Graham Neubig et al.ICML 2025
  3. Provable Benefits of RLVR over SFT for Reasoning Models: Learning to Backtrack EfficientlyStanley Wei, Juno KimICML 2026
  4. DLoFT: Gradient-Decoupled Fine-Tuning for Generalizable Long Chain-of-Thought ReasoningSitong Wu, Haoru Tan, Jingyao Li, Shaofeng Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025
  5. Select2Reason: Efficient Instruction-Tuning Data Selection for Long-CoT ReasoningCehao Yang, Xueyuan Lin, Xiaojun Wu, Chengjin Xu et al.ACL Findings 2026 · 1 citation
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines