Activation Control for Efficiently Eliciting Long Chain-of-thought Ability of Language Models
Zekai Zhao, Qi Liu, Kun Zhou, Zihan Liu, Yifei Shao, Zhiting Hu, Biwei Huang
Abstract
Despite the remarkable reasoning performance, eliciting the long chain-ofthought (CoT) ability in large language models (LLMs) typically requires costly reinforcement learning or supervised fine-tuning on high-quality distilled data. We investigate the internal mechanisms behind this capability and show that a small set of high-impact activations in the last few layers, greatly govern the long-form reasoning attributes, e.g., output length and self-reflection. Through simply amplifying these activations and adding "wait" tokens, the long CoT ability can be invoked without training, leading to significantly increased self-reflection rate and accuracy. In addition, we also find that the activation changes follow predictable trajectories, i.e., a sharp rise after special tokens and a subsequent exponential decay. Based on these insights, we introduce a general training-free activation control technique. It utilizes a few contrastive examples to identify the relevant activations, and then incorporates simple analytic functions to adjust their values at inference time to elicit long CoTs. Extensive experiments have verified the effectiveness of our methods in efficiently eliciting the long CoT ability of LLMs and improving the performance. Besides, we further propose a parameter-efficient fine-tuning method that trains only the last-layer activation amplification module and a few LoRA layers, outperforming LoRA on reasoning benchmarks with much fewer parameters. Our code and data are fully public released at https://github.com/ZekaiZ123/EELo-CoT.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a4f86732-ddea-478a-bdce-af8ab0b5a7abCited by top-tier papers3
- FIRE-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on the Rediscovery of Scientific InsightsZhen Wang, Fan Bai, Zhongyan Luo, Jinyan Su et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- More Sail than Ballast: Addressing Harmful Knowledge Leakage in the Expansive Reasoning Space of LRMsQibing Ren, Xinhao Song, Ke Fan, Lijun Li et al.ICML 2026
- Outlier Matters: Efficient Long-to-Short Reasoning via Outlier-Guided Model MergingQiyuan Zhu, Dezhi Li, Lujun Li, Xiaoyu Qin et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on24
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
- Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentionWoosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng et al.SOSP 2023 · 1,016 citations
- PAL: Program-aided Language ModelsLuyu Gao, Aman Madaan, Shuyan Zhou, Uri Alon et al.ICML 2023 · 700 citations
Related papers
- Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought ReasoningShiming Yang, Yuxuan Tong, Xinyao Niu, Graham Neubig et al.ICML 2025
- Investigating Mysteries of CoT-Augmented DistillationSomin Wadhwa, Silvio Amir, Byron C. WallaceEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Rethinking Chain-of-Thought from the Perspective of Self-TrainingZongqian Wu, Baoduo Xu, Ruochen Cui, Mengmeng Zhan et al.ICML 2025
- When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMsYuyang Wu, Yifei Wang, Ziyu Ye, Tianqi Du et al.ICLR 2026 · 225 citations
- Large Language Models Can Self-ImproveJiaxin Huang, Shixiang Gu, Le Hou, Yuexin Wu et al.EMNLP 2023 · 184 citations
