Lune

ACL Findings2026

Select2Reason: Efficient Instruction-Tuning Data Selection for Long-CoT Reasoning

Cehao Yang, Xueyuan Lin, Xiaojun Wu, Chengjin Xu, Xuhui Jiang, Honghao Liu, Hui Xiong, Jian Guo

Abstract

A practical approach to activate long chain-ofthoughts reasoning ability in large language models is to perform supervised fine-tuning on instruction datasets synthesized by strong large reasoning models, offering a cost-effective alternative to reinforcement learning. However, large-scale instruction sets incur significant training overhead, while effective strategies for automatic data selection still remain unexplored. We propose SELECT2REASON, a novel and efficient instruction-tuning data selection framework for long-CoT reasoning. From the perspective of emergence of rethinking behaviors like self-correction and backtracking, we investigate metrics that may determine the quality of long-CoT instructions. SELECT2REASON leverages a difficulty-aware reward model to estimate the learning value of questions and jointly incorporates a reasoning trace length-based heuristic through a weighted scheme for ranking to prioritize high-utility examples. Empirical results on OpenR1-Math-220k demonstrate that fine-tuning LLM on only 10% of the data selected by our method achieves performance competitive with or superior to full-data tuning and open-source baseline across nine competition-level mathematical benchmarks and four broader reasoning tasks. Further experiments highlight the scalability in varying data size, efficiency during inference, and adaptability to other instruction pools of SELECT2REASON with minimal cost.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 2 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers2

  1. Which Reasoning Trajectories Teach Students to Reason Better? A Simple Metric of Informative AlignmentYuming Yang, Mingyoung Lai, Wanxu Zhao, Xiaoran Fan et al.ACL 2026 · 5 citations
  2. Quadratic Coreset Selection: Certifying and Reconciling Sequence and Token Mining for Efficient Instruction TuningZiliang Chen, Yongsen Zheng, Zhao-Rong Lai, Zhanfu Yang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations

Builds on21

  1. Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
  2. FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work PartitioningTri DaoICLR 2024 · 2,600 citations
  3. ZeRO: memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter modelsSamyam Rajbhandari, Jeff Rasley, Olatunji Ruwase, Yuxiong HeSC 2020 · 852 citations
  4. Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
  5. MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language ModelsLonghui Yu, Weisen Jiang, Han Shi, Jincheng Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 637 citations

Related papers

  1. Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought ReasoningShiming Yang, Yuxuan Tong, Xinyao Niu, Graham Neubig et al.ICML 2025
  2. Provable Benefits of RLVR over SFT for Reasoning Models: Learning to Backtrack EfficientlyStanley Wei, Juno KimICML 2026
  3. Correct, Concise and Complete: Multi-stage Training For Adaptive ReasoningNathanaël Carraz Rakotonirina, Ren Pang, Neha Anna John, Michael Bohlke-Schneider et al.ACL Findings 2026
  4. Rectifying LLM Thought from Lens of OptimizationJunnan Liu, Hongwei Liu, Songyang Zhang, Kai ChenICLR 2026 · 3 citations
  5. Language Models Can Easily Learn to Reason from DemonstrationsDacheng Li, Shiyi Cao, Tyler Griggs, Shu Liu et al.EMNLP Findings 2025 · 7 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines