Assessing the Creativity of LLMs in Proposing Novel Solutions to Mathematical Problems
Junyi Ye, Jingyi Gu, Xinyun Zhao, Wenpeng Yin, Grace Guiling Wang
Abstract
The mathematical capabilities of AI systems are complex and multifaceted. Most existing research has predominantly focused on the correctness of AI-generated solutions to mathematical problems. In this work, we argue that beyond producing correct answers, AI systems should also be capable of, or assist humans in, developing novel solutions to mathematical challenges. This study explores the creative potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in mathematical reasoning, an aspect that has received limited attention in prior research. We introduce a novel framework and benchmark, CreativeMath, which encompasses problems ranging from middle school curricula to Olympic-level competitions, designed to assess LLMs' ability to propose innovative solutions after some known solutions have been provided. Our experiments demonstrate that, while LLMs perform well on standard mathematical tasks, their capacity for creative problem-solving varies considerably. Notably, the Gemini-1.5-Pro model outperformed other LLMs in generating novel solutions. This research opens a new frontier in evaluating AI creativity, shedding light on both the strengths and limitations of LLMs in fostering mathematical innovation, and setting the stage for future developments in AI-assisted mathematical discovery.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d46e45bb-7601-4b22-8aa0-48b70ba8c901Cited by top-tier papers4
- Language of Thought Shapes Output Diversity in Large Language ModelsShaoyang Xu, Wenxuan ZhangACL 2026 · 3 citations
- Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of Long Reasoning ModelsXingyu Chen, Jiahao Xu, Tian Liang, Zhiwei He et al.ICML 2025
- CLAWS: Creativity detection for LLM-generated solutions using Attention Window of SectionsKeuntae Kim, Eunhye Jeong, Sehyeon Lee, Seohee Yoon et al.NeurIPS 2025
- Automated Creativity Evaluation of Language Models Across Open-Ended TasksTan Min Sen, Zachary Choy Kit Chun, Syed Ali Redha Alsagoff, Nadya Yuki Wangsajaya et al.ACL 2026
Builds on5
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
- LEVER: Learning to Verify Language-to-Code Generation with ExecutionAnsong Ni, Srini Iyer, Dragomir Radev, Veselin Stoyanov et al.ICML 2023 · 318 citations
- How AI Processing Delays Foster Creativity: Exploring Research Question Co-Creation with an LLM-based AgentYiren Liu, Si Chen, Haocong Cheng, Mengxia Yu et al.CHI 2024 · 57 citations
Related papers
- Creativity or Brute Force? Using Brainteasers as a Window into the Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language ModelsSophia Simeng Han, Howard Dai, Stephen Xia, Grant Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark for Large Language ModelsBofei Gao, Feifan Song, Zhe Yang, Zefan Cai et al.ICLR 2025 · 3 citations
- Exposing the Achilles' Heel: Evaluating LLMs Ability to Handle Mistakes in Mathematical ReasoningJoykirat Singh, Akshay Uttama Nambi, Vibhav VineetACL 2025 · 10 citations
- MathScale: Scaling Instruction Tuning for Mathematical ReasoningZhengyang Tang, Xingxing Zhang, Benyou Wang, Furu WeiICML 2024 · 163 citations
- UGMathBench: A Diverse and Dynamic Benchmark for Undergraduate-Level Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language ModelsXin Xu, Jiaxin Zhang, Tianhao Chen, Zitong Chao et al.ICLR 2025
