CLAWS: Creativity detection for LLM-generated solutions using Attention Window of Sections
Keuntae Kim, Eunhye Jeong, Sehyeon Lee, Seohee Yoon, Yong Suk Choi
Abstract
Recent advances in enhancing the reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) have been remarkably successful. LLMs trained with Reinforcement Learning (RL) for reasoning demonstrate strong performance in challenging tasks such as mathematics and coding, even with relatively small model sizes. However, despite these impressive improvements in task accuracy, the assessment of creativity in LLM generations has been largely overlooked in reasoning tasks, in contrast to writing tasks. The lack of research on creativity assessment in reasoning primarily stems from two challenges: (1) the difficulty of defining the range of creativity, and (2) the necessity of human evaluation in the assessment process. To address these challenges, we propose CLAWS, a novel method that defines and classifies mathematical solutions into Typical, Creative, and Hallucinated categories without human evaluation, by leveraging attention weights across prompt sections and output. CLAWS outperforms five existing white-box detection methods-Perplexity, Logit Entropy, Window Entropy, Hidden Score, and Attention Score-on five 7-8B math RL models (DeepSeek, Qwen, Mathstral, OpenMath2, and Oreal). We validate CLAWS on 4,545 math problems collected from 181 math contests (A(J)HSME, AMC, AIME). Our code is available at https://github.com/kkt94/CLAWS.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on12
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and DiversityRobert Kirk, Ishita Mediratta, Christoforos Nalmpantis, Jelena Luketina et al.ICLR 2024 · 332 citations
- SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language ModelsPotsawee Manakul, Adian Liusie, Mark J. F. GalesEMNLP 2023 · 331 citations
- INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination DetectionChao Chen, Kai Liu, Ze Chen, Yi Gu et al.ICLR 2024 · 281 citations
Related papers
- Assessing the Creativity of LLMs in Proposing Novel Solutions to Mathematical ProblemsJunyi Ye, Jingyi Gu, Xinyun Zhao, Wenpeng Yin et al.AAAI 2025 · 2 citations
- MATH-Beyond: A Benchmark for RL to Expand Beyond the Base ModelPrasanna Mayilvahanan, Ricardo Dominguez-Olmedo, Thaddäus Wiedemer, Wieland BrendelICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- Creativity or Brute Force? Using Brainteasers as a Window into the Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language ModelsSophia Simeng Han, Howard Dai, Stephen Xia, Grant Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All DomainsXueguang Ma, Qian Liu, Dongfu Jiang, Ge Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 153 citations
- Incentivizing LLMs to Self-Verify Their AnswersFuxiang Zhang, Jiacheng Xu, Chaojie Wang, Ce Cui et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
