MATH-Beyond: A Benchmark for RL to Expand Beyond the Base Model
Prasanna Mayilvahanan, Ricardo Dominguez-Olmedo, Thaddäus Wiedemer, Wieland Brendel
Abstract
With the advent of DeepSeek-R1, a new wave of reinforcement learning (RL) methods has emerged that seem to unlock stronger mathematical reasoning. However, a closer look at the open-source ecosystem reveals a critical limitation: with sufficiently many draws (e.g., ), many existing base models already solve nearly all questions on widely used math benchmarks such as MATH-500 and AIME 2024. This suggests that the RL fine-tuning methods prevalent in the LLM reasoning literature largely sharpen existing solution modes rather than discovering entirely new ones. Such sharpening stands in contrast to the broader promise of RL: to foster exploration and to acquire new skills. To move beyond this plateau, we introduce MATH-Beyond (MATH-B), a benchmark deliberately constructed to defeat common open-source models of up to 8B parameters even under large sampling budgets. Improving performance on our benchmark via RL requires methods that learn to reason in ways that go beyond base model capabilities in repeated sampling. Since the problems are drawn from subsets of DAPO-Math-17K and DeepScaleR datasets, they remain topically equivalent to standard high-school math. Validating our premise, RL fine-tuned models such as Nemotron-Research-Reasoning-Qwen-1.5B and DeepScaleR-1.5B-Preview perform poorly on MATH-B at , showing how existing approaches fall short on tackling harder instances. We hope MATH-B will catalyze exploration-driven RL approaches that elicit deeper reasoning capabilities. We release MATH-B at https://huggingface.co/datasets/brendel-group/MATH-Beyond.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0977ef23-65fb-48a8-a25d-173b31dc1976Cited by top-tier papers2
- Neural Thickets: Diverse Task Experts Are Dense Around Pretrained WeightsYulu Gan, Phillip IsolaICML 2026 · 17 citations
- LC-ERD: Mining Latent Logic for Self-Evolving Reasoning via Consistency-Regulated Reward DecompositionYanyu Chen, Jiyue Jiang, Dianzhi Yu, Zheng Wu et al.KDD 2026
Builds on15
- DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
- Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?Zhiqi Chen, Rui Lu, Andrew Zhao, Zhaokai Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1,109 citations
- Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training ExampleYiping Wang, Qing Yang, Zhiyuan Zeng, Liliang Ren et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 314 citations
- DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing ReasoningZhiwei He, Tian Liang, Jiahao Xu, Qiuzhi Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 271 citations
Related papers
- AceReason-Nemotron: Advancing Math and Code Reasoning through Reinforcement LearningYang Chen, Zhuolin Yang, Zihan Liu, Chankyu Lee et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 79 citations
- QuestA: Expanding Reasoning Capacity in LLMs via Question AugmentationJiazheng Li, Hongzhou Lin, Hong Lu, Kaiyue Wen et al.ICLR 2026 · 42 citations
- How Far Are We from Optimal Reasoning Efficiency?Jiaxuan Gao, Shu Yan, Qixin Tan, Lu Yang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- Eliciting Reasoning in Language Models with Cognitive ToolsBrown Ebouky, Andrea Bartezzaghi, Mattia RigottiNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- ReTool: Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Tool Use in LLMsJiazhan Feng, Shijue Huang, Xingwei Qu, Ge Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 406 citations
