Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark for Large Language Models
Bofei Gao, Feifan Song, Zhe Yang, Zefan Cai, Yibo Miao, Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Chenghao Ma, Liang Chen, Runxin Xu, Zhengyang Tang, Benyou Wang
Abstract
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have led to significant breakthroughs in mathematical reasoning capabilities. However, existing benchmarks like GSM8K or MATH are now being solved with high accuracy (e.g., OpenAI o1 achieves 94.8% on MATH dataset), indicating their inadequacy for truly challenging these models. To bridge this gap, we propose a comprehensive and challenging benchmark specifically designed to assess LLMs' mathematical reasoning at the Olympiad level. Unlike existing Olympiad-related benchmarks, our dataset focuses exclusively on mathematics and comprises a vast collection of 4428 competition-level problems with rigorous human annotation. These problems are meticulously categorized into over 33 sub-domains and span more than 10 distinct difficulty levels, enabling a holistic assessment of model performance in Olympiad-mathematical reasoning. Furthermore, we conducted an in-depth analysis based on this benchmark. Our experimental results show that even the most advanced models, OpenAI o1-mini and OpenAI o1-preview, struggle with highly challenging Olympiad-level problems, with 60.54% and 52.55% accuracy, highlighting significant challenges in Olympiad-level mathematical reasoning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers106
- Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?Zhiqi Chen, Rui Lu, Andrew Zhao, Zhaokai Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1,109 citations
- Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training ExampleYiping Wang, Qing Yang, Zhiyuan Zeng, Liliang Ren et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 314 citations
- DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing ReasoningZhiwei He, Tian Liang, Jiahao Xu, Qiuzhi Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 271 citations
- ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical ReasoningChujie Zheng, Zhenru Zhang, Beichen Zhang, Runji Lin et al.ACL 2025 · 209 citations
- GPG: A Simple and Strong Reinforcement Learning Baseline for Model ReasoningXiangxiang Chu, Hailang Huang, Xiao Zhang, Fei Wei et al.ICLR 2026 · 168 citations
Related papers
- UGMathBench: A Diverse and Dynamic Benchmark for Undergraduate-Level Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language ModelsXin Xu, Jiaxin Zhang, Tianhao Chen, Zitong Chao et al.ICLR 2025
- Exposing the Achilles' Heel: Evaluating LLMs Ability to Handle Mistakes in Mathematical ReasoningJoykirat Singh, Akshay Uttama Nambi, Vibhav VineetACL 2025 · 10 citations
- OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific ProblemsChaoqun He, Renjie Luo, Yuzhuo Bai, Shengding Hu et al.ACL 2024 · 18 citations
- MathNet: A Global Multimodal Benchmark for Mathematical Reasoning and RetrievalShaden Alshammari, Kevin Wen, Abrar Zainal, Mark Hamilton et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Is Your Model Really A Good Math Reasoner? Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning with ChecklistZihao Zhou, Shudong Liu, Maizhen Ning, Wei Liu et al.ICLR 2025
