Asymptotic Instance-Optimal Algorithms for Interactive Decision Making
Kefan Dong, Tengyu Ma
Abstract
Past research on interactive decision making problems (bandits, reinforcement learning, etc.) mostly focuses on the minimax regret that measures the algorithm's performance on the hardest instance. However, an ideal algorithm should adapt to the complexity of a particular problem instance and incur smaller regrets on easy instances than worst-case instances. In this paper, we design the first asymptotic instance-optimal algorithm for general interactive decision making problems with finite number of decisions under mild conditions. On every instance , our algorithm outperforms all consistent algorithms (those achieving non-trivial regrets on all instances), and has asymptotic regret , where is an exact characterization of the complexity of . The key step of the algorithm involves hypothesis testing with active data collection. It computes the most economical decisions with which the algorithm collects observations to test whether an estimated instance is indeed correct; thus, the complexity is the minimum cost to test the instance against other instances. Our results, instantiated on concrete problems, recover the classical gap-dependent bounds for multi-armed bandits [Lai and Robbins, 1985] and prior works on linear bandits [Lattimore and Szepesvari, 2017], and improve upon the previous best instance-dependent upper bound [Xu et al., 2021] for reinforcement learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d34c074a-5794-4e0d-96a1-81246f0949f8Cited by top-tier papers6
- Provably Efficient Exploration in Quantum Reinforcement Learning with Logarithmic Worst-Case RegretHan Zhong, Jiachen Hu, Yecheng Xue, Tongyang Li et al.ICML 2024 · 11 citations
- Sample Complexity Reduction via Policy Difference Estimation in Tabular Reinforcement LearningAdhyyan Narang, Andrew Wagenmaker, Lillian J. Ratliff, Kevin JamiesonNeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
- Regret Minimization via Saddle Point OptimizationJohannes Kirschner, Seyed Alireza Bakhtiari, Kushagra Chandak, Volodymyr Tkachuk et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 3 citations
- The Role of Coverage in Online Reinforcement LearningTengyang Xie, Dylan J. Foster, Yu Bai, Nan Jiang et al.ICLR 2023 · 1 citation
- Is O(log N) practical? Near-Equivalence Between Delay Robustness and Bounded Regret in Bandits and RLEnoch H. Kang, P. R. KumarNeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation
Builds on4
- Beyond UCB: Optimal and Efficient Contextual Bandits with Regression OraclesDylan J. Foster, Alexander RakhlinICML 2020 · 241 citations
- Provable Model-based Nonlinear Bandit and Reinforcement Learning: Shelve Optimism, Embrace Virtual CurvatureKefan Dong, Jiaqi Yang, Tengyu MaNeurIPS 2021 · 39 citations
- Structure Adaptive Algorithms for Stochastic BanditsRémy Degenne, Han Shao, Wouter M. KoolenICML 2020 · 32 citations
- Near Instance-Optimal PAC Reinforcement Learning for Deterministic MDPsAndrea Tirinzoni, Aymen Al Marjani, Emilie KaufmannNeurIPS 2022 · 20 citations
Related papers
- Model-Free Reinforcement Learning with the Decision-Estimation CoefficientDylan J. Foster, Noah Golowich, Jian Qian, Alexander Rakhlin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
- Assouad, Fano, and Le Cam with Interaction: A Unifying Lower Bound Framework and Characterization for Bandit LearnabilityFan Chen, Dylan J. Foster, Yanjun Han, Jian Qian et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations
- Instance-optimal PAC Algorithms for Contextual BanditsZhaoqi Li, Lillian J. Ratliff, Houssam Nassif, Kevin Jamieson et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 26 citations
- A Closer Look at the Worst-case Behavior of Multi-armed Bandit AlgorithmsAnand Kalvit, Assaf ZeeviNeurIPS 2021 · 48 citations
- Task-Optimal Exploration in Linear Dynamical SystemsAndrew J. Wagenmaker, Max Simchowitz, Kevin JamiesonICML 2021 · 24 citations
