The Role of Coverage in Online Reinforcement Learning
Tengyang Xie, Dylan J. Foster, Yu Bai, Nan Jiang, Sham M. Kakade
Abstract
Coverage conditions -- which assert that the data logging distribution adequately covers the state space -- play a fundamental role in determining the sample complexity of offline reinforcement learning. While such conditions might seem irrelevant to online reinforcement learning at first glance, we establish a new connection by showing -- somewhat surprisingly -- that the mere existence of a data distribution with good coverage can enable sample-efficient online RL. Concretely, we show that coverability -- that is, existence of a data distribution that satisfies a ubiquitous coverage condition called concentrability -- can be viewed as a structural property of the underlying MDP, and can be exploited by standard algorithms for sample-efficient exploration, even when the agent does not know said distribution. We complement this result by proving that several weaker notions of coverage, despite being sufficient for offline RL, are insufficient for online RL. We also show that existing complexity measures for online RL, including Bellman rank and Bellman-Eluder dimension, fail to optimally capture coverability, and propose a new complexity measure, the sequential extrapolation coefficient, to provide a unification.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3ccba79b-c507-4172-bdc9-5361071c234cCited by top-tier papers44
- The Importance of Online Data: Understanding Preference Fine-tuning via CoverageYuda Song, Gokul Swamy, Aarti Singh, J. Andrew Bagnell et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 63 citations
- Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with General Preference ModelChenlu Ye, Wei Xiong, Yuheng Zhang, Hanze Dong et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 60 citations
- Leveraging Offline Data in Online Reinforcement LearningAndrew Wagenmaker, Aldo PacchianoICML 2023 · 47 citations
- Making RL with Preference-based Feedback Efficient via RandomizationRunzhe Wu, Wen SunICLR 2024 · 44 citations
- Maximize to Explore: One Objective Function Fusing Estimation, Planning, and ExplorationZhihan Liu, Miao Lu, Wei Xiong, Han Zhong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 30 citations
Builds on25
- Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?Ying Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran WangICML 2021 · 419 citations
- Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of PessimismParia Rashidinejad, Banghua Zhu, Cong Ma, Jiantao Jiao et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 373 citations
- Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement LearningTengyang Xie, Ching-An Cheng, Nan Jiang, Paul Mineiro et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 339 citations
- Bellman Eluder Dimension: New Rich Classes of RL Problems, and Sample-Efficient AlgorithmsChi Jin, Qinghua Liu, Sobhan MiryoosefiNeurIPS 2021 · 264 citations
- Learning Near Optimal Policies with Low Inherent Bellman ErrorAndrea Zanette, Alessandro Lazaric, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Emma BrunskillICML 2020 · 238 citations
Related papers
- What can online reinforcement learning with function approximation benefit from general coverage conditions?Fanghui Liu, Luca Viano, Volkan CevherICML 2023 · 6 citations
- Harnessing Density Ratios for Online Reinforcement LearningPhilip Amortila, Dylan J. Foster, Nan Jiang, Ayush Sekhari et al.ICLR 2024 · 14 citations
- Scalable Online Exploration via CoverabilityPhilip Amortila, Dylan J. Foster, Akshay KrishnamurthyICML 2024 · 10 citations
- What are the Statistical Limits of Offline RL with Linear Function Approximation?Ruosong Wang, Dean P. Foster, Sham M. KakadeICLR 2021 · 172 citations
- Offline Learning in Markov Games with General Function ApproximationYuheng Zhang, Yu Bai, Nan JiangICML 2023 · 17 citations
