Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learning
Tengyang Xie, Ching-An Cheng, Nan Jiang, Paul Mineiro, Alekh Agarwal
Abstract
The use of pessimism, when reasoning about datasets lacking exhaustive exploration has recently gained prominence in offline reinforcement learning. Despite the robustness it adds to the algorithm, overly pessimistic reasoning can be equally damaging in precluding the discovery of good policies, which is an issue for the popular bonus-based pessimism. In this paper, we introduce the notion of Bellman-consistent pessimism for general function approximation: instead of calculating a point-wise lower bound for the value function, we implement pessimism at the initial state over the set of functions consistent with the Bellman equations. Our theoretical guarantees only require Bellman closedness as standard in the exploratory setting, in which case bonus-based pessimism fails to provide guarantees. Even in the special case of linear function approximation where stronger expressivity assumptions hold, our result improves upon a recent bonus-based approach by in its sample complexity when the action space is finite. Remarkably, our algorithms automatically adapt to the best bias-variance tradeoff in the hindsight, whereas most prior approaches require tuning extra hyperparameters a priori.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cc7dae98-92e2-482d-91d8-f76e6ff3b271Cited by top-tier papers175
- Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-constraintWei Xiong, Hanze Dong, Chenlu Ye, Ziqi Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 346 citations
- Cal-QL: Calibrated Offline RL Pre-Training for Efficient Online Fine-TuningMitsuhiko Nakamoto, Simon Zhai, Anikait Singh, Max Sobol Mark et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 296 citations
- Principled Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback from Pairwise or K-wise ComparisonsBanghua Zhu, Michael I. Jordan, Jiantao JiaoICML 2023 · 273 citations
- Pessimistic Model-based Offline Reinforcement Learning under Partial CoverageMasatoshi Uehara, Wen SunICLR 2022 · 176 citations
- Pessimistic Bootstrapping for Uncertainty-Driven Offline Reinforcement LearningChenjia Bai, Lingxiao Wang, Zhuoran Yang, Zhi-Hong Deng et al.ICLR 2022 · 173 citations
Builds on14
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy OptimizationTianhe Yu, Garrett Thomas, Lantao Yu, Stefano Ermon et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 989 citations
- MOReL: Model-Based Offline Reinforcement LearningRahul Kidambi, Aravind Rajeswaran, Praneeth Netrapalli, Thorsten JoachimsNeurIPS 2020 · 870 citations
- Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?Ying Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran WangICML 2021 · 419 citations
- Provably Efficient Exploration in Policy OptimizationQi Cai, Zhuoran Yang, Chi Jin, Zhaoran WangICML 2020 · 304 citations
Related papers
- Offline Learning in Markov Games with General Function ApproximationYuheng Zhang, Yu Bai, Nan JiangICML 2023 · 17 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning as Anti-explorationShideh Rezaeifar, Robert Dadashi, Nino Vieillard, Léonard Hussenot et al.AAAI 2022 · 64 citations
- Pessimistic Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Towards Optimal Sample ComplexityLaixi Shi, Gen Li, Yuting Wei, Yuxin Chen et al.ICML 2022 · 110 citations
- Near-optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning with Linear Representation: Leveraging Variance Information with PessimismMing Yin, Yaqi Duan, Mengdi Wang, Yu-Xiang WangICLR 2022 · 74 citations
- Nearly Minimax Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation: Single-Agent MDP and Markov GameWei Xiong, Han Zhong, Chengshuai Shi, Cong Shen et al.ICLR 2023 · 2 citations
