Offline Reinforcement Learning as Anti-exploration
Shideh Rezaeifar, Robert Dadashi, Nino Vieillard, Léonard Hussenot, Olivier Bachem, Olivier Pietquin, Matthieu Geist
Abstract
Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) aims at learning an optimal control from a fixed dataset, without interactions with the system. An agent in this setting should avoid selecting actions whose consequences cannot be predicted from the data. This is the converse of exploration in RL, which favors such actions. We thus take inspiration from the literature on bonus-based exploration to design a new offline RL agent. The core idea is to subtract a prediction-based exploration bonus from the reward, instead of adding it for exploration. This allows the policy to stay close to the support of the dataset and practically extends some previous pessimism-based offline RL methods to a deep learning setting with arbitrary bonuses. We also connect this approach to a more common regularization of the learned policy towards the data. Instantiated with a bonus based on the prediction error of a variational autoencoder, we show that our simple agent is competitive with the state of the art on a set of continuous control locomotion and manipulation tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 35596185-3e44-4e8a-b48f-c3fa66a44ce5Cited by top-tier papers19
- Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline DataPhilip J. Ball, Laura Smith, Ilya Kostrikov, Sergey LevineICML 2023 · 326 citations
- Pessimistic Model-based Offline Reinforcement Learning under Partial CoverageMasatoshi Uehara, Wen SunICLR 2022 · 176 citations
- Pessimistic Bootstrapping for Uncertainty-Driven Offline Reinforcement LearningChenjia Bai, Lingxiao Wang, Zhuoran Yang, Zhi-Hong Deng et al.ICLR 2022 · 173 citations
- Revisiting the Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningDenis Tarasov, Vladislav Kurenkov, Alexander Nikulin, Sergey KolesnikovNeurIPS 2023 · 148 citations
- Pessimistic Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Towards Optimal Sample ComplexityLaixi Shi, Gen Li, Yuting Wei, Yuxin Chen et al.ICML 2022 · 110 citations
Builds on7
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy OptimizationTianhe Yu, Aviral Kumar, Rafael Rafailov, Aravind Rajeswaran et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 549 citations
- Critic Regularized RegressionZiyu Wang, Alexander Novikov, Konrad Zolna, Josh Merel et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 406 citations
- EMaQ: Expected-Max Q-Learning Operator for Simple Yet Effective Offline and Online RLSeyed Kamyar Seyed Ghasemipour, Dale Schuurmans, Shixiang Shane GuICML 2021 · 138 citations
- Munchausen Reinforcement LearningNino Vieillard, Olivier Pietquin, Matthieu GeistNeurIPS 2020 · 120 citations
Related papers
- MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy OptimizationTianhe Yu, Garrett Thomas, Lantao Yu, Stefano Ermon et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 989 citations
- MOReL: Model-Based Offline Reinforcement LearningRahul Kidambi, Aravind Rajeswaran, Praneeth Netrapalli, Thorsten JoachimsNeurIPS 2020 · 870 citations
- Survival Instinct in Offline Reinforcement LearningAnqi Li, Dipendra Misra, Andrey Kolobov, Ching-An ChengNeurIPS 2023 · 26 citations
- Regularizing a Model-based Policy Stationary Distribution to Stabilize Offline Reinforcement LearningShentao Yang, Yihao Feng, Shujian Zhang, Mingyuan ZhouICML 2022 · 14 citations
- Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?Ying Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran WangICML 2021 · 419 citations
