Making RL with Preference-based Feedback Efficient via Randomization
Runzhe Wu, Wen Sun
Abstract
Reinforcement Learning algorithms that learn from human feedback (RLHF) need to be efficient in terms of statistical complexity, computational complexity, and query complexity. In this work, we consider the RLHF setting where the feedback is given in the format of preferences over pairs of trajectories. In the linear MDP model, using randomization in algorithm design, we present an algorithm that is sample efficient (i.e., has near-optimal worst-case regret bounds) and has polynomial running time (i.e., computational complexity is polynomial with respect to relevant parameters). Our algorithm further minimizes the query complexity through a novel randomized active learning procedure. In particular, our algorithm demonstrates a near-optimal tradeoff between the regret bound and the query complexity. To extend the results to more general nonlinear function approximation, we design a model-based randomized algorithm inspired by the idea of Thompson sampling. Our algorithm minimizes Bayesian regret bound and query complexity, again achieving a near-optimal tradeoff between these two quantities. Computation-wise, similar to the prior Thompson sampling algorithms under the regular RL setting, the main computation primitives of our algorithm are Bayesian supervised learning oracles which have been heavily investigated on the empirical side when applying Thompson sampling algorithms to RL benchmark problems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers28
- Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-constraintWei Xiong, Hanze Dong, Chenlu Ye, Ziqi Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 346 citations
- What Makes a Reward Model a Good Teacher? An Optimization PerspectiveNoam Razin, Zixuan Wang, Hubert Strauss, Stanley Wei et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 73 citations
- Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with General Preference ModelChenlu Ye, Wei Xiong, Yuheng Zhang, Hanze Dong et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 60 citations
- Exploration-Driven Policy Optimization in RLHF: Theoretical Insights on Efficient Data UtilizationYihan Du, Anna Winnicki, Gal Dalal, Shie Mannor et al.ICML 2024 · 22 citations
- Optimal Design for Human Preference ElicitationSubhojyoti Mukherjee, Anusha Lalitha, Kousha Kalantari, Aniket Deshmukh et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 20 citations
Builds on26
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Value-Targeted RegressionAlex Ayoub, Zeyu Jia, Csaba Szepesvári, Mengdi Wang et al.ICML 2020 · 324 citations
- Principled Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback from Pairwise or K-wise ComparisonsBanghua Zhu, Michael I. Jordan, Jiantao JiaoICML 2023 · 273 citations
- FLAMBE: Structural Complexity and Representation Learning of Low Rank MDPsAlekh Agarwal, Sham M. Kakade, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Wen SunNeurIPS 2020 · 271 citations
Related papers
- Efficient Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning: Randomized Exploration meets Experimental DesignAndreas Schlaginhaufen, Reda Ouhamma, Maryam KamgarpourNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Human-in-the-loop: Provably Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with General Function ApproximationXiaoyu Chen, Han Zhong, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran Wang et al.ICML 2022 · 90 citations
- Local policy search with Bayesian optimizationSarah Müller, Alexander von Rohr, Sebastian TrimpeNeurIPS 2021 · 67 citations
- Sequential Preference Ranking for Efficient Reinforcement Learning from Human FeedbackMinyoung Hwang, Gunmin Lee, Hogun Kee, Chanwoo Kim et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 24 citations
- Bayesian Optimization from Human Feedback: Near-Optimal Regret BoundsAya Kayal, Sattar Vakili, Laura Toni, Da-shan Shiu et al.ICML 2025
