Near Instance-Optimal PAC Reinforcement Learning for Deterministic MDPs
Andrea Tirinzoni, Aymen Al Marjani, Emilie Kaufmann
Abstract
In probably approximately correct (PAC) reinforcement learning (RL), an agent is required to identify an -optimal policy with probability . While minimax optimal algorithms exist for this problem, its instance-dependent complexity remains elusive in episodic Markov decision processes (MDPs). In this paper, we propose the first nearly matching (up to a horizon squared factor and logarithmic terms) upper and lower bounds on the sample complexity of PAC RL in deterministic episodic MDPs with finite state and action spaces. In particular, our bounds feature a new notion of sub-optimality gap for state-action pairs that we call the deterministic return gap. While our instance-dependent lower bound is written as a linear program, our algorithms are very simple and do not require solving such an optimization problem during learning. Their design and analyses employ novel ideas, including graph-theoretical concepts (minimum flows) and a new maximum-coverage exploration strategy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext edca98e4-fa4b-4514-af2b-86fa1318dc56Cited by top-tier papers13
- Instance-Dependent Near-Optimal Policy Identification in Linear MDPs via Online Experiment DesignAndrew Wagenmaker, Kevin JamiesonNeurIPS 2022 · 38 citations
- Reinforcement Learning Can Be More Efficient with Multiple RewardsChristoph Dann, Yishay Mansour, Mehryar MohriICML 2023 · 24 citations
- Model-Free Active Exploration in Reinforcement LearningAlessio Russo, Alexandre ProutièreNeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
- Multi-Reward Best Policy IdentificationAlessio Russo, Filippo VannellaNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- The Value of Reward Lookahead in Reinforcement LearningNadav Merlis, Dorian Baudry, Vianney PerchetNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
Builds on11
- Reward-Free Exploration for Reinforcement LearningChi Jin, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Max Simchowitz, Tiancheng YuICML 2020 · 226 citations
- PC-PG: Policy Cover Directed Exploration for Provable Policy Gradient LearningAlekh Agarwal, Mikael Henaff, Sham M. Kakade, Wen SunNeurIPS 2020 · 126 citations
- Fast active learning for pure exploration in reinforcement learningPierre Ménard, Omar Darwiche Domingues, Anders Jonsson, Emilie Kaufmann et al.ICML 2021 · 110 citations
- Towards Instance-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning with PessimismMing Yin, Yu-Xiang WangNeurIPS 2021 · 93 citations
- Fast Pure Exploration via Frank-WolfePo-An Wang, Ruo-Chun Tzeng, Alexandre ProutièreNeurIPS 2021 · 56 citations
Related papers
- Beyond Value-Function Gaps: Improved Instance-Dependent Regret Bounds for Episodic Reinforcement LearningChristoph Dann, Teodor Vanislavov Marinov, Mehryar Mohri, Julian ZimmertNeurIPS 2021 · 41 citations
- On Gap-dependent Bounds for Offline Reinforcement LearningXinqi Wang, Qiwen Cui, Simon S. DuNeurIPS 2022 · 19 citations
- Settling the Horizon-Dependence of Sample Complexity in Reinforcement LearningYuanzhi Li, Ruosong Wang, Lin F. YangFOCS 2021 · 3 citations
- Instance-optimal PAC Algorithms for Contextual BanditsZhaoqi Li, Lillian J. Ratliff, Houssam Nassif, Kevin Jamieson et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 26 citations
- Instance-Dependent Fixed-Budget Pure Exploration in Reinforcement LearningYeongjong Kim, Yeoneung Kim, Kwang-Sung JunICLR 2026
