Fast active learning for pure exploration in reinforcement learning
Pierre Ménard, Omar Darwiche Domingues, Anders Jonsson, Emilie Kaufmann, Edouard Leurent, Michal Valko
Abstract
Realistic environments often provide agents with very limited feedback. When the environment is initially unknown, the feedback, in the beginning, can be completely absent, and the agents may first choose to devote all their effort on exploring efficiently. The exploration remains a challenge while it has been addressed with many hand-tuned heuristics with different levels of generality on one side, and a few theoretically backed exploration strategies on the other. Many of them are incarnated by intrinsic motivation and in particular explorations bonuses. A common rule of thumb for exploration bonuses is to use 1/ √ n bonus that is added to the empirical estimates of the reward, where n is a number of times this particular state (or a state-action pair) was visited. We show that, surprisingly, for a pure-exploration objective of reward-free exploration, bonuses that scale with 1/n bring faster learning rates, improving the known upper bounds with respect to the dependence on the horizon H. Furthermore, we show that with an improved analysis of the stopping time, we can improve by a factor H the sample complexity in the best-policy identification setting, which is another pure-exploration objective, where the environment provides rewards but the agent is not penalized for its behavior during the exploration phase.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 34372ac3-94d3-40b0-ab27-579e02085b97Cited by top-tier papers62
- BYOL-Explore: Exploration by Bootstrapped PredictionZhaohan Guo, Shantanu Thakoor, Miruna Pislar, Bernardo Ávila Pires et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 104 citations
- Provably Efficient Reward-Agnostic Navigation with Linear Value IterationAndrea Zanette, Alessandro Lazaric, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Emma BrunskillNeurIPS 2020 · 68 citations
- Reward-Free RL is No Harder Than Reward-Aware RL in Linear Markov Decision ProcessesAndrew J. Wagenmaker, Yifang Chen, Max Simchowitz, Simon S. Du et al.ICML 2022 · 61 citations
- DrM: Mastering Visual Reinforcement Learning through Dormant Ratio MinimizationGuowei Xu, Ruijie Zheng, Yongyuan Liang, Xiyao Wang et al.ICLR 2024 · 53 citations
- MADE: Exploration via Maximizing Deviation from Explored RegionsTianjun Zhang, Paria Rashidinejad, Jiantao Jiao, Yuandong Tian et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 51 citations
Builds on4
- Reward-Free Exploration for Reinforcement LearningChi Jin, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Max Simchowitz, Tiancheng YuICML 2020 · 226 citations
- On Reward-Free Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function ApproximationRuosong Wang, Simon S. Du, Lin F. Yang, Ruslan SalakhutdinovNeurIPS 2020 · 121 citations
- Task-agnostic Exploration in Reinforcement LearningXuezhou Zhang, Yuzhe Ma, Adish SinglaNeurIPS 2020 · 56 citations
- Planning in Markov Decision Processes with Gap-Dependent Sample ComplexityAnders Jonsson, Emilie Kaufmann, Pierre Ménard, Omar Darwiche Domingues et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 46 citations
Related papers
- Q-learning with UCB Exploration is Sample Efficient for Infinite-Horizon MDPYuanhao Wang, Kefan Dong, Xiaoyu Chen, Liwei WangICLR 2020 · 107 citations
- Exploration-Guided Reward Shaping for Reinforcement Learning under Sparse RewardsRati Devidze, Parameswaran Kamalaruban, Adish SinglaNeurIPS 2022 · 122 citations
- Model-Free Active Exploration in Reinforcement LearningAlessio Russo, Alexandre ProutièreNeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
- Stochastic Shortest Path: Minimax, Parameter-Free and Towards Horizon-Free RegretJean Tarbouriech, Runlong Zhou, Simon S. Du, Matteo Pirotta et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 40 citations
- Improved Bounds for Reward-Agnostic and Reward-Free ExplorationOran Ridel, Alon Peled-CohenICML 2026
