The Challenges of the Nonlinear Regime for Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Andrea Bonfanti, Giuseppe Bruno, Cristina Cipriani
Abstract
The Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) viewpoint is widely employed to analyze the training dynamics of overparameterized Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). However, unlike the case of linear Partial Differential Equations (PDEs), we show how the NTK perspective falls short in the nonlinear scenario. Specifically, we establish that the NTK yields a random matrix at initialization that is not constant during training, contrary to conventional belief. Another significant difference from the linear regime is that, even in the idealistic infinite-width limit, the Hessian does not vanish and hence it cannot be disregarded during training. This motivates the adoption of second-order optimization methods. We explore the convergence guarantees of such methods in both linear and nonlinear cases, addressing challenges such as spectral bias and slow convergence. Every theoretical result is supported by numerical examples with both linear and nonlinear PDEs, and we highlight the benefits of second-order methods in benchmark test cases.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d0cb2b65-7abb-4deb-98d5-dbad837b5a82Cited by top-tier papers7
- Consistency of Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Second-Order Elliptic EquationsYuqian Cheng, Zhuo Chen, Qian LinNeurIPS 2025 · 236 citations
- Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvature for Physics-Informed Neural NetworksFelix Dangel, Johannes Müller, Marius ZeinhoferNeurIPS 2024 · 31 citations
- Unveiling the Mechanism of Continuous Representation Full-Waveform Inversion: A Wave Based Neural Tangent Kernel FrameworkRuihua Chen, Yisi Luo, Bangyu Wu, Deyu MengICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Enhancing Stability of Physics-Informed Neural Network Training Through Saddle-Point ReformulationDmitry Bylinkin, Mikhail Aleksandrov, Savelii Chezhegov, Aleksandr BeznosikovICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- PINNfluence: Interpreting PINNs through Influence FunctionsAleksander Krasowski, Jonas Naujoks, Moritz Weckbecker, Galip Yolcu et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on4
- Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networksAditi S. Krishnapriyan, Amir Gholami, Shandian Zhe, Robert M. Kirby et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,421 citations
- On the linearity of large non-linear models: when and why the tangent kernel is constantChaoyue Liu, Libin Zhu, Mikhail BelkinNeurIPS 2020 · 183 citations
- Achieving High Accuracy with PINNs via Energy Natural Gradient DescentJohannes Müller, Marius ZeinhoferICML 2023 · 13 citations
- Gradient Descent Finds the Global Optima of Two-Layer Physics-Informed Neural NetworksYihang Gao, Yiqi Gu, Michael NgICML 2023 · 12 citations
Related papers
- The asymptotic spectrum of the Hessian of DNN throughout trainingArthur Jacot, Franck Gabriel, Clément HonglerICLR 2020 · 39 citations
- MultiAdam: Parameter-wise Scale-invariant Optimizer for Multiscale Training of Physics-informed Neural NetworksJiachen Yao, Chang Su, Zhongkai Hao, Songming Liu et al.ICML 2023 · 27 citations
- Fast Convergence of Natural Gradient Descent for Over-parameterized Physics-Informed Neural NetworksXianliang Xu, Wang Kong, Jiaheng Mao, Zhongyi Huang et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Global Convergence in Neural ODEs: Impact of Activation FunctionsTianxiang Gao, Siyuan Sun, Hailiang Liu, Hongyang GaoICLR 2025
- An operator preconditioning perspective on training in physics-informed machine learningTim De Ryck, Florent Bonnet, Siddhartha Mishra, Emmanuel de BézenacICLR 2024 · 28 citations
