Lune

CHI2026Top-tier venue

On the Computational Reproducibility of Human-Computer Interaction

Olga Iarygina, Kasper Hornbæk, Aske Mottelson

2026Year
1Citations

Abstract

An increasing number of HCI researchers have embraced open science ideas, such as sharing data and analysis code. However, such practices are only meaningful when the shared data and code enable other researchers to reproduce and reuse the reported findings. To investigate the reproducibility of HCI research, we identified all CHI papers that have shared study data and analysis code, and attempted to reproduce the results. We were able to fully reproduce 49% of the papers. We surveyed and interviewed authors, asking them to assess the reproducibility of their own work and to reflect on their motivations and obstacles in doing open science. We discuss what improves and hinders reproducibility and provide recommendations on how to increase reproducibility rates in HCI. While the value of replicability remains contested in HCI, we argue that the more modest goal of reproducibility is desirable.

• Human-centered computing → HCI theory, concepts and models; • General and reference → Empirical studies; • Applied computing → Digital libraries and archives.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext d08b3602-2a3d-4b83-ba96-8668ab0fc292

Builds on4

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines