Apéritif: Scaffolding Preregistrations to Automatically Generate Analysis Code and Methods Descriptions
Yuren Pang, Katharina Reinecke, René Just
Abstract
The HCI community has been advocating preregistration as a practice to improve the credibility of scientific research. However, it remains unclear how HCI researchers preregister studies and what preregistration users perceive as benefits and challenges. By systematically reviewing the past four CHI proceedings and surveying 11 researchers, we found that only 1.11% of papers presented preregistered studies, though both authors and reviewers of preregistered studies perceive it as beneficial. Our formative studies revealed key challenges ranging from a lack of detail about the study design, hindering comprehensibility, to inconsistencies between preregistrations and published papers. To explore ways for addressing these issues, we developed Apéritif, a research prototype that scaffolds the preregistration process and automatically generates analysis code and a methods description. In an evaluation with 17 HCI researchers, we found that Apéritif reduces the effort of preregistering a study, facilitates researchers' workflows, and promotes consistency between research artifacts.
• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6ff71ee3-faae-4bd4-87c4-4abdf22967e5Cited by top-tier papers4
- Changes in Research Ethics, Openness, and Transparency in Empirical Studies between CHI 2017 and CHI 2022Kavous Salehzadeh Niksirat, Lahari Goswami, Pooja Rao S. B., James Tyler et al.CHI 2023 · 43 citations
- "That's important, but...": How Computer Science Researchers Anticipate Unintended Consequences of Their Research InnovationsKimberly Do, Rock Yuren Pang, Jiachen Jiang, Katharina ReineckeCHI 2023 · 40 citations
- EQUI-VOCAL: Synthesizing Queries for Compositional Video Events from Limited User InteractionsEnhao Zhang, Maureen Daum, Dong He, Brandon Haynes et al.VLDB 2023 · 18 citations
- FEDT: Supporting experiment design and execution in HCI fabrication researchValkyrie Savage, Harrison Goldstein, Nóra Püsök, Jia Yi Ren et al.UIST 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on6
- How WEIRD is CHI?Sebastian Linxen, Christian Sturm, Florian Brühlmann, Vincent Cassau et al.CHI 2021 · 254 citations
- Transparency of CHI Research Artifacts: Results of a Self-Reported SurveyChat Wacharamanotham, Lukas Eisenring, Steve Haroz, Florian EchtlerCHI 2020 · 120 citations
- Boba: Authoring and Visualizing Multiverse AnalysesYang Liu, Alex Kale, Tim Althoff, Jeffrey HeerIEEE VIS 2020 · 79 citations
- Paths Explored, Paths Omitted, Paths Obscured: Decision Points & Selective Reporting in End-to-End Data AnalysisYang Liu, Tim Althoff, Jeffrey HeerCHI 2020 · 40 citations
- Are You Open? A Content Analysis of Transparency and Openness Guidelines in HCI JournalsNick Ballou, Vivek R. Warriar, Sebastian DeterdingCHI 2021 · 19 citations
Related papers
- On the Computational Reproducibility of Human-Computer InteractionOlga Iarygina, Kasper Hornbæk, Aske MottelsonCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- PilotAR: Streamlining Pilot Studies with OHMDs from Concept to InsightNuwan Janaka, Runze Cai, Ashwin Ram, Lin Zhu et al.UbiComp 2024 · 11 citations
- Exploring Positionality in HCI: Perspectives, Trends, and ChallengesAneesha Singh, Martin Johannes Dechant, Dilisha Patel, Ewan Soubutts et al.CHI 2025 · 42 citations
- What We Talk About When We Talk About Frameworks in HCIShitao Fang, Koji Yatani, Kasper HornbækCHI 2026 · 4 citations
- Towards Better Reflexive Thematic Analysis in HCI: A Scoping Review of Practice at CHIJacob M. Rigby, Ioanna IacovidesCHI 2026 · 6 citations
