Towards Better Reflexive Thematic Analysis in HCI: A Scoping Review of Practice at CHI
Jacob M. Rigby, Ioanna Iacovides
Abstract
Reflexive Thematic Analysis is an increasingly popular method of qualitative analysis in many disciplines, including HCI. However, previous work has questioned the quality of its application, often finding it misunderstood and misapplied. To establish a snapshot of current practice in HCI, we performed a scoping review to examine 147 CHI papers from a single year that purported to use the method. Markers of good and poor practice were assessed based on writings and guidelines by the method's originators. Similar to reviews in other domains, we found widespread issues such as methodological incongruence, insufficient detail, and poorly conceptualised and reported themes. Despite this, we highlight encouraging pockets of good practice. We conclude that HCI researchers should engage more holistically with Reflexive TA, and question whether it is always the most appropriate choice of method. To this end we offer several recommendations for improvement.
• Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 84ce5a86-a6b9-4033-98c4-78341f0493ddBuilds on13
- How WEIRD is CHI?Sebastian Linxen, Christian Sturm, Florian Brühlmann, Vincent Cassau et al.CHI 2021 · 254 citations
- Using Thematic Analysis in Healthcare HCI at CHI: A Scoping ReviewRobert Bowman, Camille Nadal, Kellie Morrissey, Anja Thieme et al.CHI 2023 · 106 citations
- Simulacrum of Stories: Examining Large Language Models as Qualitative Research ParticipantsShivani Kapania, William Agnew, Motahhare Eslami, Hoda Heidari et al.CHI 2025 · 59 citations
- Exploring Positionality in HCI: Perspectives, Trends, and ChallengesAneesha Singh, Martin Johannes Dechant, Dilisha Patel, Ewan Soubutts et al.CHI 2025 · 42 citations
- Unpacking Trust Dynamics in the LLM Supply Chain: An Empirical Exploration to Foster Trustworthy LLM Production & UseAgathe Balayn, Mireia Yurrita, Fanny Rancourt, Fabio Casati et al.CHI 2025 · 16 citations
Related papers
- Participatory AI Justice in HCI: A Scoping ReviewMaria Luce Lupetti, Cristina Zaga, Nazli CilaCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- On the Computational Reproducibility of Human-Computer InteractionOlga Iarygina, Kasper Hornbæk, Aske MottelsonCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- What We Talk About When We Talk About Frameworks in HCIShitao Fang, Koji Yatani, Kasper HornbækCHI 2026 · 4 citations
- A Critique of Electrodermal Activity Practices at CHIEbrahim Babaei, Benjamin Tag, Tilman Dingler, Eduardo VellosoCHI 2021 · 64 citations
- A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of Community-Collaborative Approaches to Computing ResearchNed Cooper, Tiffanie Horne, Gillian R. Hayes, Courtney Heldreth et al.CHI 2022 · 97 citations
