Portobello: Extending Driving Simulation from the Lab to the Road
Fanjun Bu, Stacey Li, David Goedicke, Mark Colley, Gyanendra Sharma, Wendy Ju
Abstract
Fig. 1. Portobello enables platform portability, so that the same study can be run on in-lab (left) and on-road (right) driving simulation platforms.
In automotive user interface design, testing often starts with lab-based driving simulators and migrates toward on-road studies to mitigate risks. Mixed reality (XR) helps translate virtual study designs to the real road to increase ecological validity. However, researchers rarely run the same study in both in-lab and on-road simulators due to the challenges of replicating studies in both physical and virtual worlds. To provide a common infrastructure to port in-lab study designs on-road, we built a platform-portable infrastructure, Portobello, to enable us to run twinned physical-virtual studies. As a proof-of-concept, we extended the on-road simulator XR-OOM with Portobello. We ran a within-subjects, autonomous-vehicle crosswalk cooperation study (N =32) both in-lab and on-road to investigate study design portability and platform-driven influences on study outcomes. To our knowledge, this is the first system that enables the twinning of studies originally designed for in-lab simulators to be carried out in an on-road platform.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d07b173d-9d44-4f70-a57f-da12c766c702Cited by top-tier papers3
- ProVoice: Designing Proactive Functionality for In-Vehicle Conversational Assistants using Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization to Enhance Driver ExperienceJosh Susak, Yifu Liu, Pascal Jansen, Mark ColleyCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Bumpy Ride? Understanding the Effects of External Forces on Spatial Interactions in Moving VehiclesMarkus Sasalovici, Albin Zeqiri, Robin Connor Schramm, Oscar Javier Ariza Nunez et al.CHI 2025 · 2 citations
- MIRAGE: Enabling Real-Time Automotive Mediated RealityPascal Jansen, Julian Britten, Mark Colley, Markus Sasalovici et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on10
- Effects of Semantic Segmentation Visualization on Trust, Situation Awareness, and Cognitive Load in Highly Automated VehiclesMark Colley, Benjamin Eder, Jan Ole Rixen, Enrico RukzioCHI 2021 · 100 citations
- Autonomous Vehicle-Cyclist Interaction: Peril and PromiseMing Hou, Karthik Mahadevan, Sowmya Somanath, Ehud Sharlin et al.CHI 2020 · 71 citations
- SwiVR-Car-Seat: Exploring Vehicle Motion Effects on Interaction Quality in Virtual Reality Automated Driving Using a Motorized Swivel SeatMark Colley, Pascal Jansen, Enrico Rukzio, Jan GugenheimerUbiComp 2022 · 50 citations
- XR-OOM: MiXed Reality driving simulation with real cars for research and designDavid Goedicke, Alexandra W. D. Bremers, Sam Lee, Fanjun Bu et al.CHI 2022 · 49 citations
- Toward Immersive Self-Driving Simulations: Reports from a User Study across Six PlatformsDohyeon Yeo, Gwangbin Kim, Seungjun KimCHI 2020 · 49 citations
Related papers
- A Multi-Modality Evaluation of the Reality Gap in Autonomous Driving SystemsStefano Carlo Lambertenghi, Mirena Flores Valdez, Andrea StoccoASE 2025 · 1 citation
- Exploring Interface Design of MR Translation System for Everyday InteractionJiyeon Oh, Jin-Woo JeongCHI 2026
- Analyzing Pedestrian Behavior in Augmented Reality - Proof of ConceptPhilipp Maruhn, André Dietrich, Lorenz Prasch, Sonja SchneiderIEEE VR 2020 · 13 citations
- SemanticAdapt: Optimization-based Adaptation of Mixed Reality Layouts Leveraging Virtual-Physical Semantic ConnectionsYifei Cheng, Yukang Yan, Xin Yi, Yuanchun Shi et al.UIST 2021 · 143 citations
- AutoVis: Enabling Mixed-Immersive Analysis of Automotive User Interface Interaction StudiesPascal Jansen, Julian Britten, Alexander Häusele, Thilo Segschneider et al.CHI 2023 · 38 citations
