Disinformation Capabilities of Large Language Models
Ivan Vykopal, Matús Pikuliak, Ivan Srba, Róbert Móro, Dominik Macko, Mária Bieliková
Abstract
Automated disinformation generation is often listed as an important risk associated with large language models (LLMs). The theoretical ability to flood the information space with disinformation content might have dramatic consequences for societies around the world. This paper presents a comprehensive study of the disinformation capabilities of the current generation of LLMs to generate false news articles in the English language. In our study, we evaluated the capabilities of 10 LLMs using 20 disinformation narratives. We evaluated several aspects of the LLMs: how good they are at generating news articles, how strongly they tend to agree or disagree with the disinformation narratives, how often they generate safety warnings, etc. We also evaluated the abilities of detection models to detect these articles as LLM-generated. We conclude that LLMs are able to generate convincing news articles that agree with dangerous disinformation narratives.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cedcca05-56cc-40d2-ad91-2e4595bef8f6Cited by top-tier papers17
- Source Code Summarization in the Era of Large Language ModelsWeisong Sun, Yun Miao, Yuekang Li, Hongyu Zhang et al.ICSE 2025 · 37 citations
- Beyond Binary: Towards Fine-Grained LLM-Generated Text Detection via Role Recognition and Involvement MeasurementZihao Cheng, Li Zhou, Feng Jiang, Benyou Wang et al.WWW 2025 · 20 citations
- What Does the Bot Say? Opportunities and Risks of Large Language Models in Social Media Bot DetectionShangbin Feng, Herun Wan, Ningnan Wang, Zhaoxuan Tan et al.ACL 2024 · 19 citations
- Evaluation of LLM Vulnerabilities to Being Misused for Personalized Disinformation GenerationAneta Zugecova, Dominik Macko, Ivan Srba, Róbert Móro et al.ACL 2025 · 18 citations
- Token Buncher: Shielding LLMs from Harmful Reinforcement Learning Fine-TuningWeitao Feng, Lixu Wang, Peizhuo Lv, Tianyi Wei et al.CCS 2026 · 9 citations
Builds on2
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- MULTITuDE: Large-Scale Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detection BenchmarkDominik Macko, Róbert Móro, Adaku Uchendu, Jason Samuel Lucas et al.EMNLP 2023 · 25 citations
Related papers
- LLM-Generated Fake News Induces Truth Decay in News Ecosystem: A Case Study on Neural News RecommendationBeizhe Hu, Qiang Sheng, Juan Cao, Yang Li et al.SIGIR 2025 · 7 citations
- MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the WildYafu Li, Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi et al.ACL 2024 · 44 citations
- Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?Canyu Chen, Kai ShuICLR 2024 · 270 citations
- DiNaM: Disinformation Narrative Mining with Large Language ModelsWitold Sosnowski, Arkadiusz Modzelewski, Kinga Skorupska, Adam WierzbickiEMNLP 2025
- Beyond Accuracy: Experts See AI Fact-Checks as Accurate but Less UsefulChenyan Jia, Apoorva Gondimalla, Angie Zhang, David Joseph Mullings et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
